Reform UK Boss Issues Huge Defection Update – Bad News for Kemi and Starmer
Nigel Farage has continued to make political defections a central part of Reform UK’s strategy, with the party attracting figures from both the Conservative and Labour political worlds.
The issue has become particularly significant for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, after several senior Conservatives moved to Reform, while Prime Minister Keir Starmer has also faced the challenge of seeing politicians and former political figures attracted by Farage’s party.
The biggest move came in January 2026, when Robert Jenrick, a former Conservative leadership candidate and former shadow justice secretary, defected to Reform UK. His decision followed his dismissal from the Conservative frontbench by Badenoch, who said she had received evidence that he was secretly planning to leave the party.
Jenrick subsequently appeared alongside Farage and formally announced that he was joining Reform. Reuters described him as the highest-profile Conservative defector to Reform at that point, while noting that the move followed a wider series of departures from the Conservatives.
The episode demonstrated how defections can become much more than changes of party membership. They can also become public arguments about the direction of British politics.
Robert Jenrick’s dramatic move
Jenrick’s defection was particularly important because of his position inside the Conservative Party.
He had served in senior government positions under previous Conservative administrations and had challenged Badenoch in the 2024 Conservative leadership contest.
After the Conservatives lost power in the 2024 general election, Jenrick became shadow justice secretary under Badenoch.
His eventual departure therefore represented the loss of a prominent politician who had been closely involved in the Conservative Party’s attempt to rebuild itself in opposition.
Badenoch acted before Jenrick announced his move.
She said she had been presented with what she called “clear, irrefutable evidence” that he was planning to defect in a way that would damage the Conservative Party. Jenrick then joined Farage at a Reform press conference later the same day.
Farage openly celebrated the development, thanking Badenoch for what he described as effectively delivering Jenrick to Reform.
The episode created a striking political contrast: Badenoch was attempting to maintain the Conservative Party as an independent political force, while Farage was attempting to attract politicians from the same electoral territory.
More than one defection
Jenrick was not an isolated case.
Reuters reported that Reform had benefited from a series of high-profile Conservative defections, including former Home Secretary Suella Braverman. The party had also attracted other former Conservative figures as Farage sought to expand its political organisation.
These moves matter because Reform is no longer simply operating as a protest movement outside Westminster.
The party has elected MPs and local representatives and has sought to present itself as a potential governing organisation.
Recruiting experienced politicians gives the party people with previous government, parliamentary and policy experience.
At the same time, defections create tensions for the parties losing their members.
For the Conservatives, every departure raises questions about the party’s ability to retain politicians who appeal to voters on issues such as immigration, taxation, national sovereignty and public services.
For Labour, the situation is somewhat different because the most prominent confirmed defections to Reform have largely come from the Conservative side.
Nevertheless, Farage has repeatedly suggested that Labour figures could also move.
Farage’s Labour defection claim
Immediately after Jenrick’s move, Farage claimed that a “well known” Labour figure would join Reform.
Sky News examined several possible names at the time, while also noting that Farage had carefully described the person as a “Labour figure” rather than specifically a Labour MP.
One person mentioned in the speculation was Gisela Stuart, the former Labour MP and former chair of Vote Leave.
However, Stuart explicitly denied that she was preparing to defect to Reform.
That episode illustrated one of the difficulties surrounding political defection stories: a claim about an impending move can generate substantial attention even when the identity of the person involved is uncertain.
It also shows why announcements from political leaders need to be distinguished from confirmed changes of party membership.
Why Badenoch is directly affected
For Badenoch, the defections present a difficult political problem.
She has sought to rebuild the Conservatives after the party’s defeat in 2024 while maintaining a clear distinction between the Conservatives and Reform UK.
In August 2026, Badenoch publicly ruled out a coalition with Farage’s party.
She also criticised Conservative politicians who had left for Reform, describing some of the defectors in highly negative terms and saying that a future Conservative-Reform hybrid was not an option.
Her position makes the defection issue particularly important.
If the Conservatives cooperate closely with Reform, they risk blurring the distinction between the two parties.
If they refuse cooperation, Reform can continue presenting itself as an alternative to the established Conservative leadership.
Badenoch therefore faces a political situation in which every prominent defection can become part of a wider argument about what the Conservative Party represents.
Starmer faces a different challenge
Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has also been affected by the wider political fragmentation, although the pattern of defections has been different.
When Jenrick joined Reform, Starmer said that former Conservatives were moving towards Farage because they believed their own party was failing.
That interpretation was political rather than an objective explanation for every individual decision.
Jenrick himself offered a different explanation, arguing that the Conservatives had failed to change sufficiently after their election defeat.
This distinction matters because politicians who change parties normally give their own reasons.
Some cite policy disagreements.
Others point to leadership, electoral strategy or the direction of their former party.
The significance of a defection therefore depends not only on the individual politician but also on the political message attached to the move.
Reform’s changing political identity
The recruitment of politicians such as Jenrick has also raised questions about Reform’s own identity.
Farage originally built his political reputation through UKIP and later the Brexit Party before becoming leader of Reform UK.
The party has now attracted politicians with backgrounds inside the Conservative establishment.
That creates an interesting contradiction in Reform’s political development.
The party has frequently criticised established political institutions and traditional party structures, yet it is increasingly incorporating politicians who have held senior positions within those structures.
Supporters can interpret this as evidence that experienced politicians are joining a new political project.
Critics can argue that it makes Reform increasingly similar to the establishment it once opposed.
Neither interpretation changes the underlying fact: the party has recruited prominent politicians from outside its original core.
The wider battle for the centre-right
The defections also reflect a broader struggle over the future of Britain’s centre-right.
The Conservatives have historically been the principal party of the British right.
Reform is challenging that position by campaigning on issues including immigration, Brexit, taxation, government spending and national sovereignty.
The arrival of former Conservative ministers gives Reform additional political experience while also intensifying competition between the two parties.
This competition has become especially visible in polling.
A YouGov poll conducted on September 20 and 21, 2026, reported by The Times, put both Reform and the Conservatives on 21% of voting intention, with Labour on 23%. The poll is a snapshot of opinion rather than a prediction of an election result, and voting intentions can change significantly before an election.
That makes the battle for former Conservative voters particularly important to both parties.
Defections do not automatically mean electoral success
One important point is often lost in the excitement surrounding defections.
A politician changing parties does not automatically translate into votes for the new party.
Individual politicians bring their own reputations, constituencies and political histories.
Voters may support a politician personally while disagreeing with the party they join.
Similarly, some voters may interpret a defection as evidence that the new party is gaining credibility, while others may see it as evidence that the politician has abandoned their previous commitments.
The political effect therefore has to be assessed over time rather than assumed immediately.
Reform’s latest position
The most important confirmed developments in 2026 show that Farage’s strategy remains focused on expanding Reform beyond its original political base.
The party has attracted former Conservative ministers and MPs, while Farage has repeatedly suggested that further defections could occur.
At the same time, Reform has experienced its own internal difficulties.
In September, Sarah Cooper-Lesadd, a Reform member of the Senedd, defected to Plaid Cymru. She criticised Reform’s approach to Wales and said she believed the party’s central organisation was focused heavily on Farage’s Westminster ambitions.
That demonstrates that defections are not a one-way phenomenon.
Political organisations can gain members while also losing others.
The significance of the next defection
For Farage, a high-profile defection remains a useful way of generating political attention.
For Badenoch, each Conservative departure raises questions about party unity and the challenge posed by Reform.
For Starmer, Reform’s expansion creates another competitor for voters across Britain’s increasingly fragmented political landscape.
But the consequences of individual defections should not be overstated.
The most important issue is what happens after the headlines disappear.
Do defectors help develop policy?
Do they bring additional supporters?
Do they strengthen the organisation in Parliament?
And do voters respond positively to the change?
Those questions cannot be answered simply by announcing that another politician has crossed the floor.
What can be established is that Reform has demonstrated an ability to attract prominent figures from the Conservative political world, while Farage has continued to signal that he wants the party to expand further.
The January 2026 defection of Robert Jenrick remains one of the clearest examples of that strategy. It directly involved Badenoch, produced a high-profile confrontation over Conservative Party loyalty and gave Farage an opportunity to present Reform as an expanding political force.
The broader political story is therefore not simply about one politician changing parties.
It is about a changing party system in which Reform UK, the Conservatives and Labour are competing for different sections of an increasingly fragmented electorate.
Farage’s defection strategy has made that competition more visible.
And as Britain moves towards its next general election, every significant change of political allegiance is likely to be examined not only for the identity of the politician involved, but also for what it reveals about the changing shape of British politics.
Reform UK’s chairman has revealed he has turned down multiple MPs seeking to defect to the party as he issued a stark “last chance” warning to politicians in Westminster. Dr David Bull, speaking exclusively to the Daily Expresso Podcast hosted by JJ Anisiobi, confirmed the party has rejected sitting parliamentarians from across all parties who are “not the right fit”.
The defection revelation comes as Reform set a May 7 deadline for MPs wanting to join Nigel Farage‘s insurgent party. Dr Bull said: “I’ve actually turned down sitting members of Parliament, because they are not the right fit.”
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
He confirmed he had rejected “quite a few” from across the political spectrum, insisting Reform would “not need to compromise” on its values to attract defectors. The party chairman issued a blunt ultimatum to wavering MPs, saying: “You have until May 7, you’re either with us or you’re not.”
Dr Bull warned: “What we cannot afford to do is to be a retirement home for failed MPs.” He added: “We will take people who subscribe to our values, and only people who subscribe to our values.”
The comments come after a string of Tory MPs made the jump to Reform, including Nadhim Zahawi, Andrew Rosindell and Robert Jenrick last week. Dr Bull insisted Jenrick was “100% in tune with what we are doing”, defending the former Tory shadow Justice Secretary’s defection.
But when pressed by host JJ Anisiobi about whether former Labour MP Kate Hoey was being considered for defection, Dr Bull remained tight-lipped. He said: “I’m not telling you.”
When pushed further, he added: “Sure, I’m just being very careful here.” The Reform UK chairman painted a damning picture of Westminster politics, claiming: “People are quite rude about Reform” in the corridors of power.
He described Reform supporters as “people who are sick and tired of the direction of this country”. Taking aim at Labour, he said the Government had “attacked everyone”.
Bull reveals he’s rejected ‘quite a few’ MPs (Image: Getty)
Dr Bull launched a scathing tirade at the Conservative Party, claiming it was fundamentally broken. He said: “The Conservative Party is not one party, it is five or six different parties […] you’ve got the woolly liberals, you’ve got the people who may be more right of centre.”
He added it was “like holding a blancmange”, saying that the Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, is struggling to hold them together. These latest comments will make grim reading for both Kemi Badenoch and Sir Keir Starmer, who are haemorrhaging support to Reform UK in the polls.
The Reform boss struck an apocalyptic tone about Britain’s future, warning: “I feel this is the last chance saloon for the United Kingdom.” His comments come as Reform continues to surge in the polls, with recent surveys showing the party eclipsing both the Conservatives and Labour.
The May 7 deadline coincides with crucial local elections where Reform hopes to make significant gains and prove it can translate polling success into votes. Dr Bull’s insistence that Reform will remain selective about defections, stating that he is confident they can attract quality candidates without compromising its principles.