The Green Party has won the Gorton and Denton by-election in a major blow for Sir Keir Starmer. Labour came third in the Greater Manchester seat, a former stronghold, behind Zack Polanski’s left-wing party and Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.
Hannah Spencer became the Green Party’s fifth MP with 14,980 votes.
Reform candidate Matt Goodwin took 10,578 votes, with Labour’s Angeliki Stogia trailing in third on 9,364.
Conservative candidate Charlotte Cadden received just 706 votes, with the Liberal Democrats getting 653.
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
Polling had suggested the ballot was a three-horse race between Labour, Reform and the Greens.
The Prime Minister’s party had won the constituency with more than half of the vote in 2024.
But Sir Keir and Labour’s ratings have plummeted in the almost two years since then.
In her victory speech, Ms Spencer took aim at her election rivals.
She said: “I won’t accept this victory tonight without calling out politicians and divisive figures who constantly scapegoat and blame our communities for all the problems in society.”
But Reform leader Nigel Farage warned the by-election was a “victory for sectarian voting and cheating” amid concerns about people forcing family members to vote in a certain way in the contest.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (Image: Getty)
He added: “Matt Goodwin was a great candidate for us. Roll on the elections on May 7th. It will be goodbye Starmer and goodbye to the Tory party.”
Reform UK’s candidate Matt Goodwin posted on X: “We are losing our country. A dangerous Muslim sectarianism has emerged.
“We have only one general election left to save Britain. Vote Reform every chance you get. I will continue the fight. I will always fight for you. I will stand at the next general election. Matt.”
Labour Party chairwoman Anna Turley admitted the result was “clearly disappointing”, adding: “By-elections are normally difficult for the party of government, and this election was no different.”
A spokesman for the Conservative Party said: “Keir Starmer has killed the Labour Party. In losing one of Labour’s safest seats, in a constituency that has returned Labour MPs for almost a century, Starmer has shown he no longer commands the support of Labour voters and is now a lame duck leader.”
The Greens’ victory at Gorton and Denton represents the sixth largest Labour majority to be overturned at a by-election since the Second World War.
Among the five larger majorities is the one at Runcorn and Helsby that Reform overturned at a by-election in 2024.
The largest Labour majority to be overturned at a by-election since 1945 is 22,915, which was achieved by the Conservatives at Ashfield in Nottinghamshire in 1977.
Reform UK “Invasion” Fury as 545 Channel Migrants Arrive in a Single Day
Britain’s debate over Channel crossings intensified after 545 people arrived in the United Kingdom in small boats in a single day, marking the busiest day for crossings in 2026 at that point and giving Reform UK fresh ammunition for its argument that the government has failed to regain control of the country’s borders.
The arrivals were recorded on Wednesday, February 25, when a period of warmer weather created conditions that people-smuggling gangs could exploit. Ten boats crossed the Channel, bringing the number of small-boat arrivals for the year to 2,149. The figure was slightly above the 2,056 people recorded at the same point in 2025.
The development came only days after Reform UK’s home affairs spokesman Zia Yusuf used some of the party’s strongest language yet on immigration, declaring that Britain was being “invaded” by migrants.
For Reform, the 545 arrivals became another illustration of what it describes as a continuing failure to prevent irregular migration. Yusuf has argued that successive Conservative and Labour governments have been unable to stop the crossings and that much more aggressive measures are required.
But the political dispute involves more than one day of arrivals. It has become a wider argument about whether the government’s strategy of cooperation with France, deportations, asylum reform and action against smuggling gangs can significantly reduce the number of people attempting the dangerous Channel journey.
545 arrivals in one day
The figure of 545 was significant because it represented the highest daily total recorded during 2026 at that stage.
According to reporting from The Times, the arrivals occurred after a period of poor weather had limited crossings. The improvement in conditions was followed by renewed launches from the French coast, with ten small boats reaching British waters. Migrants were brought ashore at Ramsgate in Kent, which was being used while maintenance work was taking place at Dover.
The February total subsequently passed 1,000, while the year-to-date figure reached 2,149.
The number itself does not establish why every individual made the journey or what the outcome of each asylum claim would eventually be. People arriving by small boat may subsequently enter the asylum system, where individual claims are assessed under UK immigration and asylum law.
Nevertheless, the scale of the daily arrival immediately became a political issue.
Reform UK used it to reinforce its argument that the government’s existing approach was insufficient.
Yusuf’s “invasion” language
Yusuf’s description of Britain as being “invaded” has become one of the most controversial elements of Reform’s immigration rhetoric.
The Reform spokesman has used the term while promoting a much tougher immigration programme, including the creation of a proposed UK Deportation Command. The party has said such a force would track down, detain and deport people who have no legal right to remain in the country. Reform has proposed a capacity of up to 288,000 removals a year under its wider programme.
The word “invasion” is, however, a political characterization rather than a neutral description of Channel migration.
The factual issue is that thousands of people have crossed the English Channel in small boats since the phenomenon became a major feature of British immigration politics. The scale of crossings has fluctuated considerably from year to year, with weather conditions playing an important operational role.
The latest figures have therefore been interpreted differently by different political parties.
Reform sees them as evidence that stronger border measures are required. The government argues that it is taking action both to disrupt smuggling networks and to increase removals.
The government’s response
The Labour government has sought to tackle small-boat crossings through cooperation with France, enforcement against smuggling networks, changes to asylum policy and increased removals.
In April 2026, the UK and France announced a strengthened agreement designed to increase patrols, intelligence-sharing and other resources in northern France. The British government said cooperation since the 2024 election had prevented more than 42,000 people from crossing the Channel and contributed to the arrest of 480 suspected smugglers in 2025.
The government has also highlighted its removal programme.
According to the Home Office, nearly 60,000 people with no legal right to remain or foreign criminals had been returned or deported since the Labour government came to power, representing a 31 per cent increase compared with the preceding 19-month period.
The government has additionally introduced reforms intended to make the asylum system more conditional.
Measures announced in March 2026 included plans to remove accommodation and financial support from asylum seekers who illegally work, can support themselves, have a right to work or have broken the law. The government said the changes were designed to create a more compliance-based asylum-support system.
Those measures demonstrate that the disagreement between Labour and Reform is not simply about whether immigration should be controlled. Both parties support stronger controls in different forms; the major differences concern the scale, mechanisms and legal framework of those controls.
The “one in, one out” arrangement with France
One of the most closely watched parts of the government’s strategy has been its agreement with France allowing certain people arriving in small boats to be returned while people with approved cases can be transferred to Britain through the reciprocal arrangement.
The policy has been heavily criticised by Reform and other opposition politicians because the number of returns has remained small compared with the total number of crossings.
By February 25, the Home Office had returned 312 people to France under the arrangement, while 367 asylum seekers had been transferred to Britain under the reciprocal element. The Times reported that fewer than 2 per cent of small-boat migrants had been returned to France under the scheme since its introduction.
The figures have provided Reform with an opportunity to argue that the arrangement does not yet operate on a scale capable of fundamentally changing the incentives facing people attempting the journey.
The government, meanwhile, has continued to emphasize the broader cooperation with France and its wider programme of disrupting crossings before boats launch.
The people-smuggling networks
Another important element of the debate concerns the criminal organizations arranging the crossings.
The government has increasingly focused on attacking the business model behind small boats rather than concentrating exclusively on people once they arrive in Britain.
Data published in February showed that Border Security Command had been involved in more than 3,600 disruption activities against people-smuggling gangs during 2025. These activities included arrests, seizures and interventions designed to prevent crossings from taking place. LBC reported that disruption activity had increased by 75 per cent since Border Security Command was established in 2024.
The government argues that tackling the gangs is essential because simply intercepting individual boats does not necessarily eliminate the wider criminal infrastructure facilitating the journeys.
Reform takes a broader approach, arguing that prevention must be combined with large-scale detention and removal.
Reform’s alternative programme
Reform’s proposed response is significantly more extensive than the government’s current programme.
The party has proposed a UK Deportation Command and a large-scale operation intended to identify, detain and deport people it says have no legal right to remain.
The party has also proposed using the Royal Navy to intercept small boats in the Channel under its “Operation Fortress” plan. Reform says boats would be stopped and returned to France or Belgium, and argues that the policy would be consistent with international law.
The proposal represents a fundamental change in emphasis.
Rather than relying primarily on cooperation with France to disrupt crossings and a smaller return mechanism, Reform envisages a direct operational role for the British military and a much larger deportation programme.
Whether such measures could be implemented would depend on legislation, international agreements, operational capacity and legal challenges.
The human cost of the Channel crisis
The debate also has a humanitarian dimension.
Small boats used for Channel crossings are often overcrowded and unsuitable for the journey. The danger was highlighted again by an independent inquiry into the November 2021 disaster in which 27 people died and four remained missing.
The inquiry identified systemic failures and missed opportunities in the maritime response and emphasized the need to prevent further deaths.
That tragedy remains an important part of the broader argument over what should happen to Channel crossings.
Supporters of tougher interception policies argue that preventing boats from launching could reduce the number of people exposed to dangerous journeys.
Critics of aggressive interception and deportation measures point instead to the obligations Britain has towards people seeking asylum and the legal protections surrounding individual claims.
The policy challenge is therefore not simply how to reduce the number of arrivals, but how to do so while maintaining an asylum system that complies with domestic and international law.
Why the 545 figure matters politically
The significance of the 545 arrivals lies partly in the timing.
The figure arrived as Reform was already making immigration one of the central themes of its political programme. It gave the party a concrete statistic with which to challenge the government’s claim that its border strategy is producing meaningful progress.
The government’s position is that the issue cannot be measured by a single day. It points to disruption operations, increased removals, cooperation with France and reforms to the asylum system as evidence of a broader effort to regain control of migration.
The competing interpretations demonstrate why daily crossing figures need to be considered alongside longer-term trends.
A single surge can reflect weather and operational conditions. Conversely, persistent high annual numbers can indicate that the underlying factors encouraging crossings have not been resolved.
In 2025, more than 41,000 people crossed the Channel in small boats, making it the second-highest annual total since the current small-boat crisis began in 2018.
A continuing political battle
The arrival of 545 people in one day has therefore become more than a border statistic.
For Reform UK, it supports the party’s argument that Britain’s existing approach is not sufficiently effective and that much stronger measures are required. Yusuf’s “invasion” language reflects the intensity of that political argument.
For the government, the same episode forms part of a wider and more complicated picture involving international cooperation, enforcement against smuggling gangs, asylum processing and removals.
The central question is likely to remain whether Britain can reduce Channel crossings substantially while ensuring that asylum claims are assessed lawfully and that dangerous journeys are prevented.
The 545 arrivals demonstrated how quickly the issue can return to the centre of national political debate. But the longer-term measure of any government’s policy will ultimately depend not on one exceptionally busy day, but on whether its combination of border enforcement, international cooperation, returns and asylum reforms produces sustained changes in the number of dangerous Channel crossings while operating within the law.