Ms Tomlinson claimed at the age of 17, she received a random text message from Walliams while he was a judge on Britain’s Got Talent, inviting her to a live show.

She said she had brought a 13-year-old female friend with her to the show, with both taken to the actor’s dressing room upon their arrival.

Ms Tomlinson claimed two other girls, aged 16 and 17, were waiting for the comedian inside the dressing room when she got there.

She alleges all four girls were left alone with Walliams, with no adults present at the time.

She told The Guardian: “It was absolutely the case, the door was shut and we were alone with him.

“He’s the sort of person who had obviously a lot of access to young women, teenage girls.”

In a social media post in 2020, Ms Tomlinson previously suggested Walliams had behaved inappropriately towards her.

She wrote at the time: “Just thinking about how a certain national treasure comedian invited me to meet him when I was 17, started liking my Instagrams when I turned 18, then DM’d me ‘looking good x’ when I was 19.”

In light of the allegations, Fremantle UK, which produces Britain’s Got Talent, has urged anyone who “feels they have been the subject of wrongdoing” to come forward.

A spokeswoman for the company said: “David Walliams has not been a judge on Britain’s Got Talent for more than four years.

“During his time on the show and in the intervening period, no complaint was ever made regarding his behaviour to Fremantle UK.

“If anyone feels they have been the subject of any impropriety or wrongdoing by anyone on any Fremantle or associated labels’ productions, we encourage them to come forward.

“We will treat any complaints seriously. Protecting the welfare of our employees, freelancers, contributors and fans has always been and absolutely remains paramount for the company.”

It comes as the Labour Party suspended the 55-year-old’s membership of the party on Thursday.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman described the claims levelled against him as “deeply troubling”.

They said: “I don’t think we’ve seen the full extent of the reporting.

“They’re clearly deeply troubling allegations, and the government will doubtless respond to them during the course of the day, I’m sure.”

In the House of Commons this afternoon, Victims Minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is “concerned” and “looking at what more it can do” regarding the use of injunctions to block the reporting of sexual misconduct allegations.

Walliams, who denies any wrongdoing, had tried to get a High Court injunction banning ITN and the Guardian from publishing the claims against him.

However, his attempt to prevent the allegations being reported was rejected last week, and he subsequently failed to lodge an appeal before the deadline at 4.30pm on Monday.

He said publication would mean he was “highly likely” to kill himself, claiming it would breach his right to life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

In a letter addressed to journalists working on this investigation, Walliams wrote: “Looking back, I realise that at times I behaved thoughtlessly towards other people I had casual sexual relationships with.

“I realise I did not always take people’s feelings properly into account. That is something I regret. And whilst a power imbalance is inevitable when one party is famous, abusing that power is something else entirely and it is something that I never did.”

He added: “I am not a sexual predator. I have not broken the law, but I am devastated that some of the women I met 10 to 20 years ago have now expressed hurt or anger towards me.”

Small-Boat Migrant Jailed After Breaking Into Family Home to Expose Himself to Girls

A small-boat migrant has been sentenced to prison after breaking into a family home in a disturbing incident in which he exposed himself to young girls. The case has raised serious concerns about public safety, the protection of children, the security of private homes and the responsibilities of individuals living in a community. It has also attracted attention because of the circumstances surrounding the offender’s arrival in the country by small boat.

According to the headline, the man entered a family property without permission and behaved in an extremely inappropriate and frightening manner towards the girls inside. For the family, what should have been a safe and private environment was suddenly turned into a place of fear and distress. A home is traditionally regarded as a sanctuary, particularly for children, who should be able to feel protected from strangers and potential dangers.

The incident highlights the serious consequences of unlawful entry into residential properties. Breaking into someone’s home is not simply a violation of property rights; it can also cause significant emotional harm to the people who live there. When children are involved, the impact can be particularly severe. Young victims may struggle to understand what has happened, and they may experience anxiety, embarrassment, fear and a lasting loss of confidence.

For parents, an incident of this nature can be especially traumatic. Every parent expects their children to be safe when they are at home, whether they are playing, studying, watching television or spending time with family members. The thought that a stranger could enter their property and expose himself to their children is deeply upsetting. Such experiences can affect the entire household, not just the direct victims.

The decision to imprison the offender demonstrates the seriousness with which the justice system can treat offences involving unlawful entry and inappropriate sexual behaviour. Prison sentences serve several important purposes. First, they punish individuals who commit criminal acts. Second, they protect the public by removing dangerous offenders from the community for a period of time. Third, they send a clear message that behaviour involving intimidation, sexual misconduct or the targeting of children will not be tolerated.

However, punishment alone cannot completely address the wider consequences of such incidents. Authorities must also consider the needs of victims and their families. Children who experience frightening or inappropriate behaviour may require professional emotional support. Access to counselling, reassurance from trusted adults and appropriate safeguarding measures can help them recover from the experience.

The case also raises broader questions about immigration and border security. The reference to the offender arriving by small boat has made his immigration circumstances part of the public discussion. Small-boat crossings have become a controversial issue in several European countries, particularly the United Kingdom, where immigration enforcement, asylum applications and border protection remain subjects of intense political debate.

It is important, however, to distinguish between the criminal actions of an individual and the wider population of migrants. A person should be held accountable for their own behaviour, but an entire group should not automatically be blamed for the actions of one offender. People arrive in other countries for many different reasons, including escaping conflict, persecution, poverty and dangerous living conditions. Many seek safety and the opportunity to rebuild their lives peacefully.

At the same time, immigration status does not place anyone above the law. Anyone who enters a country, regardless of nationality or legal circumstances, has a responsibility to respect its laws, its people and its institutions. Serious criminal behaviour must be investigated properly, and offenders should face appropriate legal consequences when the evidence establishes their guilt.

The protection of children should remain the highest priority in every society. Children are particularly vulnerable because they may not have the knowledge, experience or confidence to respond effectively when confronted by threatening behaviour. Families, schools, local authorities and law enforcement agencies all have important roles to play in creating safe environments.

Parents can help protect their children by teaching them basic personal safety principles. Children should understand that they have the right to feel safe in their own homes and that inappropriate behaviour from adults is never their fault. They should also know how to seek help immediately from a trusted adult or emergency services if they feel threatened.

Communities must also work together to prevent similar incidents. Neighbours can help maintain safer residential areas by reporting suspicious activity, supporting vulnerable households and cooperating with local authorities. However, community vigilance should always be based on responsible behaviour rather than prejudice or assumptions about someone’s nationality, appearance or immigration background.

Another important issue is the role of the criminal justice system in dealing with offenders who commit sexually inappropriate acts. Courts must carefully examine the evidence, consider the seriousness of the offence and take account of the harm caused to victims. Sentencing should reflect the circumstances of each case while ensuring that the rights of victims and defendants are respected.

Where appropriate, rehabilitation programmes may also play a role in reducing the risk of future offending. These programmes can include psychological assessments, behavioural interventions and specialist treatment designed to address harmful attitudes and behaviour. Rehabilitation does not mean ignoring the crime or reducing the suffering of victims. Rather, it recognises that preventing further offences is an important part of protecting society.

The incident also illustrates how quickly an ordinary family can become involved in a frightening criminal situation. Many people assume that their homes are completely secure, but incidents involving unlawful entry demonstrate the importance of practical safety measures. Secure doors and windows, suitable outdoor lighting, functioning locks and reliable communication with emergency services can all contribute to household security.

Nevertheless, responsibility for preventing crime must never be placed entirely on victims. Families should not have to live in constant fear or feel that they are responsible for stopping every possible criminal act. The primary responsibility belongs to those who choose to break the law, while the authorities have a duty to investigate offences and protect the public.

Public discussion surrounding this case should therefore remain focused on three essential principles: justice, child protection and the rule of law. The offender must be held accountable for the conduct established by the court. The young victims and their family deserve privacy, dignity and appropriate support. Meanwhile, immigration policies should be debated using reliable evidence rather than allowing an individual criminal case to become a reason for hostility towards an entire community.

Ultimately, this disturbing incident serves as a reminder that the safety of children and families must never be taken for granted. Every child deserves to grow up in an environment where they feel protected, respected and free from intimidation. Every family deserves to feel secure inside its own home. And every individual, regardless of where they come from, must understand that personal freedom carries responsibilities.

The prison sentence may bring a degree of justice in this particular case, but the wider lesson is that society must remain committed to protecting vulnerable people, supporting victims and preventing sexual misconduct and unlawful behaviour. Strong law enforcement, effective safeguarding policies, responsible immigration management and community cooperation are all essential to achieving these goals.

No child should ever have to experience fear or humiliation in the place where they are supposed to feel safest. Ensuring that such incidents are taken seriously is not only a matter of criminal justice; it is a fundamental responsibility shared by the entire community.