NEC told it must take steps to address fears – including not hiring Everton stadium to announce new leader before nominations even open
MPs have told the party there are growing complaints from members about the lack of involvement from members if Burnham does not face a leadership contest from any other MP.
Labour is understood to have considered hiring Everton FC’s ground to announce Burnham – a lifelong Everton fan – as the new Labour leader, but insiders have raised concerns that hiring the venue in advance – before the official deadline for nominations has even opened – could appear too presumptive to members disappointed about a lack of contest.
Party bosses are planning to organise Q&A events online to replace hustings that would have taken place in a leadership contest.
Burnham, the new MP for Makerfield, is expected to become Labour leader at a special conference on 17 July – as long as there are no other candidates who get more than 81 nominations from MPs, which now looks highly unlikely. Nominations will open a week earlier, and Burnham is expected to get the backing of hundreds of MPs and ministers.
Several members of the NEC told the Guardian there had been other moves to try to placate disgruntled members and trade unions who were unhappy about the idea of a coronation for Burnham on democratic grounds.
Trade unions will get the opportunity to express endorsements over nominations week from 9 July – or decline to give one.
That has required a “tweak” to the Labour rulebook because unions would usually nominate during the course of a contest – but union leaders have said that they must be allowed to give a formal view before Burnham is crowned Labour leader.
Burnham, who has spent the past fortnight in talks with groups of MPs and ministers, met affiliated trade union leaders on Thursday afternoon where a number are planning to quiz the PM-in-waiting about plans for oil and gas licences, as well as care worker visas.
Members of the NEC who represent constituency parties said there was also unhappiness from rank-and-file members about a lack of input in the process of choosing a new leader. The party is expected to organise online sessions for members with Burnham once he becomes leader. He is expected to enter No 10 as prime minister on Monday 20 July.
In her report from the NEC, the CLP representative Ann Black said many members were “upset by Starmer’s departure … We all need to acknowledge that, and end the tradition of driving out supporters of the previous leader every time we get a new one.”
Several MPs said they had been on the receiving end of angry criticism from members during meetings in May and June – many of whom were critical about removing Starmer as leader. MPs said the anger from members came from a range of political viewpoints, including members who had previously supported Jeremy Corbyn and had been unhappy with the leadership challenge from Owen Smith.
“There is a lot of affection for Andy but there is also anger about party disunity,” one MP said.
Another said: “Andy’s been showing a lot of interest in meeting MPs and engaging on lots of issues which has been excellent but he needs to show that to party members as well. He’s likely to have been the choice of the membership but we can’t afford to see mass departures over this leadership change because people feel ignored.”
An incredible self-own
In 1936, John Scott, son of the late Guardian owner and legendary editor CP Scott, did something unheard of for a media heir: he gave up his stake for the greater good.
After inheriting the newspaper, Scott renounced all financial benefit – bar his salary – in the Guardian (worth £1m at the time and around £62m today) and passed ownership over to the newly formed Scott Trust. The Trust would evolve to have one key mission: to secure the financial and editorial independence of the Guardian in perpetuity.
That means the Guardian can’t be bought. Not by private equity, not by a conglomerate, and definitely not by a billionaire looking for a political mouthpiece. So here are three good reasons to make the choice to support us today.
1. Our quality, investigative journalism is a scrutinising force at a time when the rich and powerful are getting away with more and more.
2. We are independent and have no billionaire owner controlling what we do, so your money directly powers our reporting.
3. It doesn’t cost much, and takes less time than it took to read this message.
But this unique model also means we depend on readers like you from Vietnam to help fund our work. If you would rather the news you read was the result of decisions made by journalists and editors, not shareholders or ultra-wealthy tech bros, then, well, you know what to do:
Support the Guardian on a monthly basis.