Jonathan Powell is reported to be considering leaving his position (Image: Getty)
Andy Burnham’s team has broken its silence after rumours that one of his top advisers was ‘set to quit’. National Security Advisor (NSA) Jonathan Powell has been instrumental in some of Britain’s most fraught security and foreign relations quandaries of the past 30 years, having been involved in the Good Friday Agreement and interactions with Libya and Syria, as well as serving as Britain’s current chief negotiator with Israel.
It’s the latter post which could be compromised by Mr Powell’s wife, the author Sarah Helm, who wrote on X on Thursday, “God help us authors who support Palestine and Palestine Action”.
Palestine Action is a proscribed terror organisation in the UK, and it is a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The Metropolitan Police said they are assessing the comments to determine “whether any further police investigation may be required”. Ms Helm’s tweet does not say she supports Palestine Action, and she has not been charged with any offence.
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
Downing Street has distanced itself from the comments, with a spokesperson saying, “These views are held by an individual who does not represent the Government in any capacity”.
But Ms Helm’s husband, Mr Powell, is reported to have been “talking about leaving for a long time” according to his friends.
Jonathan Powell (far left) with Ed Miliband and Andy Burnham meeting the US delegation last month (Image: Getty)
The Telegraph reports that Mr Powell is considering leaving his role in Downing Street, but a No 10 source has denied that he has any plans to step down. They said it was not true that he was stressed or exhausted, and said he had not been talking about leaving.
Mr Powell’s tenure in Whitehall has not been without controversy. He was part of the negotiations to hand the British Chagos Islands to Mauritius, sparking a political row with the United States over the joint UK-US base on the island of Diego Garcia. The deal has since collapsed after Donald Trump withdrew his support.
Mr Powell was also instrumental in forging closer ties with China for the doomed ex-PM Sir Keir Starmer. The Anglo-Chinese relationship came under further scrutiny late last year when the trial of two men accused of spying for Beijing collapsed.
Responding to Mr Powell’s wife, Ms Helm’s original post on X, which mentioned Palestine Action, the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) called on the police to investigate.
The group acknowledged that “spouses are entitled to independent views”, but said Ms Helm’s post “raises extremely serious questions for Jonathan Powell and the Government”.
“Clearly, the police need to investigate, and Sarah Helm must face the full force of the law, just like others who appear to express support for any proscribed terrorist organisation,” a spokesperson for the CAA added.
Ms Helm has since posted on her X account, thanking her “supporters” and adding: “As an 83-year-old survivor of the Nakba and one of my many friends in Rafah (now obliterated) said to me when I was last there, ‘keep writing Sarah, we need all the pencils we can get’.”
Jonthan Powell (right) and Gerry Adams marking the 25th anniversary of the Belfast/Good Friday (Image: PA)
In her original post, Ms Helm was responding to a discussion about Normal People author Sally Rooney, who has said she can no longer sell her books in the UK because of her support for the group. The Irish author previously said she would donate earnings from her books and BBC adaptations of novels to Palestine Action, which has a stated goal of “ending global participation in Israel’s genocidal and apartheid regime”.
As a result, Rooney’s publisher, Faber, has determined it cannot sell her novels in Britain. Figures have shown a continued surge in terror arrests after the ban on supporting Palestine Action was introduced.
Police have made mass arrests at multiple demonstrations since, where protesters have typically held up placards and worn T-shirts and badges declaring “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action”, leading to their arrests under anti-terrorism legislation.
There were 3,867 arrests for suspected terrorist activity in the year to June, of which 3,630 (94%) were linked to supporting the group. In the 12 months before the ban came into force, 234 terror arrests were made. In August, the US Government also announced sanctions against Palestine Action, designating it a terror group.
Andy Burnham’s Team Breaks Silence as Rumours Swirl Over Top Adviser’s Possible Exit
Andy Burnham’s inner circle has been forced to address growing speculation about the future of a senior adviser, after reports suggested that a key figure could be preparing to leave his position. The rumours have attracted attention because of the importance of senior advisers in shaping government policy, managing political crises and helping the Prime Minister navigate some of the most difficult decisions facing the country.
The reports concern Jonathan Powell, the UK’s National Security Adviser, whose long career has included involvement in major diplomatic negotiations and sensitive international affairs. According to reporting published in October 2026, Powell was said to be considering leaving his role. However, a Downing Street source rejected claims that he was preparing to resign, disputing suggestions that he had been discussing plans to leave or was experiencing the level of stress described in reports. No confirmed resignation had been announced in the reporting available at the time. <Cite refs={[“turn469782search0″,”turn469782search1”]}/>
The episode has prompted questions about the pressures facing senior government officials and the importance of maintaining stability at the heart of the administration. It has also highlighted the challenges of separating verified developments from speculation when rumours about prominent political figures begin circulating.
Why Jonathan Powell’s Position Matters
Jonathan Powell is an experienced diplomat and political adviser whose career has included some of Britain’s most sensitive negotiations.
He played a significant role in the negotiations leading to the Good Friday Agreement, which helped establish a framework for peace in Northern Ireland. His subsequent work has involved international diplomacy and complex security questions, making him a prominent figure in Britain’s foreign policy establishment.
As National Security Adviser, Powell occupies a position that connects the government’s political leadership with intelligence assessments, defence priorities and international security decisions. The role requires coordination across government departments and careful consideration of information that may have significant implications for Britain’s national interests.
The position is particularly demanding because national security decisions rarely occur in isolation. Developments involving Russia, instability in the Middle East, terrorism, cyber threats and Britain’s relationships with international allies can all require urgent attention.
The National Security Adviser must help ensure that ministers receive coordinated advice and that different departments work towards a consistent response.
Consequently, any suggestion that a person in such a position might leave naturally attracts attention. A departure could require arrangements for continuity, the transfer of responsibilities and the appointment of a successor with the necessary experience.
However, speculation about a possible departure does not establish that an official has decided to resign or that the government is facing an immediate operational crisis.
Downing Street Pushes Back Against Resignation Rumours
The response from Downing Street is an important part of the story.
Reports suggested that Powell had been considering leaving his position, but a source at Number 10 disputed the account and denied that he had been discussing plans to step down. The source also rejected suggestions that he was so exhausted or stressed that he had decided to leave. <Cite refs={[“turn469782search0″,”turn469782search1”]}/>
The distinction matters because political reporting can sometimes combine confirmed developments, conversations with unnamed sources and interpretations of an individual’s intentions.
A report that someone has considered leaving a position is not the same as a formal resignation. Nor does speculation about a departure establish that a disagreement with the Prime Minister has occurred.
Without an official announcement or further corroborating evidence, it would be premature to conclude that Powell’s position is ending.
The government’s response appears intended to challenge the suggestion that his departure is imminent. It also provides an indication of how seriously Downing Street regards the need to maintain clarity about the status of senior officials.
For the administration, uncertainty surrounding a key national security role could create unnecessary distractions at a time when ministers must concentrate on domestic and international priorities.
The Controversy Surrounding Powell’s Wife
The speculation about Powell’s future has also been linked in reporting to comments made by his wife, author Sarah Helm, on social media.
Helm attracted attention after posting a message expressing support for authors who supported Palestine and Palestine Action. The remarks prompted controversy because Palestine Action had been proscribed under UK terrorism legislation in July 2025. <Cite refs={[“turn469782search0″,”turn469782search1”]}/>
The issue quickly raised questions about the relationship between an official’s professional responsibilities and the independent views expressed by a family member.
Downing Street sought to distinguish the government from Helm’s comments, emphasising that her views did not represent the administration’s official position.
That distinction is important in a democratic society. Public officials are accountable for their own conduct and responsibilities, but a spouse’s political statements should not automatically be treated as evidence of the official’s personal beliefs or professional behaviour.
The legal position also requires care. Palestine Action’s proscription means that certain forms of membership or support can constitute criminal offences under UK law. However, political discussion about Palestine, criticism of government policy or disagreement with a proscription decision does not automatically establish criminal conduct.
The Metropolitan Police assessed Helm’s specific social media post and subsequently said that it did not meet the criminal threshold for further action. No further action was taken in relation to that post, according to reporting published on October 17. <Cite refs={[“turn469782search1”]}/>
This development is relevant because it distinguishes the controversy surrounding the comments from any suggestion that criminal proceedings were underway.
It also underlines why allegations and speculation must be assessed against the available evidence rather than treated as established facts.
The Pressures Facing Senior Government Advisers
The wider episode offers a glimpse into the pressures associated with senior positions in government.
Advisers responsible for national security must work across departments, respond to rapidly changing international circumstances and provide ministers with clear assessments of complicated situations.
Their work can involve long hours, confidential discussions and decisions whose consequences may not become apparent for months or years. The role also requires the ability to distinguish immediate political pressures from longer-term strategic considerations.
These demands can make senior government positions challenging, particularly when an administration is dealing with several major issues simultaneously.
However, the existence of demanding responsibilities does not establish that a particular adviser is preparing to leave. Claims about an individual’s personal circumstances should be supported by reliable evidence rather than inferred from the general pressures of public office.
In Powell’s case, the denial from Downing Street provides an important counterpoint to reports about a possible departure.
The administration’s ability to maintain continuity in national security advice remains important regardless of whether personnel changes eventually occur.
What a Departure Would Mean for National Security
If Powell were eventually to leave his position, the government would need to ensure that the transition did not disrupt the delivery of national security advice.
A successor would need to understand the government’s priorities, maintain relationships with intelligence and defence organisations, and coordinate information from across Whitehall.
Continuity would be particularly important during periods of international tension, when ministers may need rapid assessments and coordinated responses to emerging threats.
The government would also need to consider how any leadership transition affected its relationships with international partners. National security cooperation depends partly on trust, established communication channels and an understanding of how decisions are made.
Nevertheless, governments are expected to have arrangements for replacing senior officials. A change in personnel does not automatically mean that national security operations will be compromised.
The practical consequences would depend on the circumstances of the departure, the experience of the successor and the strength of existing institutional arrangements.
Until a resignation is confirmed, however, predictions about the consequences of Powell leaving remain hypothetical.
Political Stability and the Importance of Clear Communication
Rumours involving senior advisers can attract disproportionate attention because they appear to offer clues about the internal workings of government.
In reality, the departure of an adviser may result from a variety of circumstances, including career decisions, personal considerations, differences over policy or changes in the government’s organisational structure.
Without reliable evidence, it is difficult to determine which explanation applies.
That is why clear communication from Downing Street matters. When the government disputes reports about a senior official’s future, its statement gives journalists and the public an alternative account to consider.
The public can then distinguish between what has been confirmed, what has been reported by unnamed sources and what remains uncertain.
This approach is particularly important for national security appointments, where speculation can become entangled with sensitive foreign policy debates.
The government must maintain appropriate confidentiality while ensuring that significant personnel changes are communicated accurately.
What Happens Next?
The immediate question is whether further information emerges about Powell’s intentions.
A formal announcement would establish whether he plans to remain in his position or leave. Until then, the denial from Downing Street means the reports should not be interpreted as confirmation of an impending resignation.
The episode may nevertheless prompt further discussion about the demands placed on senior officials and the arrangements for maintaining continuity within the national security system.
For Burnham’s administration, the priority will be ensuring that its national security structures continue to function effectively and that ministers receive the advice required to respond to international developments.
The controversy surrounding Helm’s comments is a separate matter from the question of Powell’s professional future. The police decision not to take further action over the specific post also means that the initial assessment should not be presented as evidence of an ongoing criminal case.
Keeping these issues separate is essential to understanding the story accurately.
A Story Still Awaiting a Definitive Outcome
The reports about Jonathan Powell have generated questions about personnel, political pressure and the management of national security at the highest level of government.
Yet the most important detail remains the distinction between speculation and confirmation. Although reports suggested that Powell was considering leaving, Downing Street rejected claims that he was preparing to resign, and no confirmed departure had been announced in the available reporting.
Powell’s experience makes his role significant, but the implications of any future change would depend on the circumstances and the arrangements made by the government.
For now, the episode demonstrates how quickly rumours involving senior figures can become a major political story, particularly when they intersect with controversial public statements and sensitive government responsibilities.
The next confirmed development, rather than speculation alone, will determine whether this becomes a genuine change in the government’s national security leadership or simply a short-lived controversy over reports that Downing Street has disputed.