Jemima Goldsmith, the ex-girlfriend of Russell Brand, has accused him of “violence, coercive control and abuse”.

Ms Goldsmith, 52, who dated Brand for around a year in 2014, issued a lengthy statement on Monday night alleging that she called the police on the disgraced comedian “during a violent incident”.

Brand was sentenced to 10-and-a-half years in prison on Monday after being convicted of rape and sexual assault.

He was found guilty of raping a woman at his home in 2009, and of three counts of sexual assault against three other women.

The judge, sentencing the 51-year-old rapist, said he had “a casual, arrogant disregard of any woman’s right to say no”.

Ms Goldsmith, the former wife of ex-Pakistani Prime Minister and cricketer Imran Khan, said she felt she had no choice but to bring her allegations forward now.

In her statement, she said: “I have had my own personal experience of his violence, coercive control and abuse.

“I had to call the police to have him removed from my house in 2014 during a violent incident.

“I chose not to press charges at the time and not to go public with this, as I was worried about the impact of the press attention on my then teenage children.”

Ms Goldsmith added that she had not spoken to Brand since 2014.

She said she was “in awe of the courageous women who came forward at Brand’s trial” and was “glad and relieved” he has finally faced justice.

The mother-of-two also addressed an injunction she and Brand took out against masseuse Szilvia Berki in October 2015.

Ms Berki, then 31, came to their home in 2014 after Ms Goldsmith booked her to give Brand a birthday massage.

The massage was not taken up.

Ms Berki had claimed she was assaulted by Brand, which he denied, and the alleged incident was investigated by police, who concluded there was no case to answer.

In her post, Goldsmith wrote that she was present the entire time Brand and Ms Berki were together, adding: “I did not see anything untoward, despite the fact that he was later found guilty of sexually assaulting other women and he later physically assaulted me.

“If I saw any man abuse any woman under any circumstances, I would do my utmost to stop them, without hesitation.”

Ms Goldsmith, who is now married to businessman Cameron O’Reilly, also said she had, for several years, supported the journalists who eventually brought Brand’s crimes to light.

Brand, who has already spent four nights in custody at HMP Wandsworth, is expected to serve two-thirds of his prison sentence before being released on licence.

He will be on the sex offenders’ register for life.

Russell Brand’s Ex Jemima Goldsmith Accuses Him of ‘Violence, Coercive Control and Abuse’ in Explosive New Statement

Russell Brand’s former girlfriend Jemima Goldsmith has made deeply disturbing allegations against the disgraced comedian, accusing him of violence, coercive control and abuse during their relationship in 2014.

Her revelations emerged shortly after Brand was sentenced to ten-and-a-half years in prison following his conviction for rape and sexual assault against four women. Goldsmith’s statement has added another significant dimension to the growing scandal surrounding the former television star, whose behaviour is now facing renewed scrutiny from police, journalists and the public.

In an emotional statement published on social media, Goldsmith said she had personally experienced Brand’s abusive behaviour and had been forced to contact the police during a violent incident at her home.

She also explained why she had previously remained silent, saying she was concerned about the impact that intense media attention could have on her children, who were teenagers at the time.

Her decision to speak publicly has attracted considerable attention, particularly because she is a well-known public figure who had previously maintained a relatively private position regarding her relationship with Brand.

The allegations have also raised further questions about the number of women who may have experienced abusive behaviour during Brand’s years in the entertainment industry.

Jemima Goldsmith Breaks Her Silence

Goldsmith, who dated Brand for approximately a year around 2014, made her statement on Monday, 9 November 2026.

She began by expressing her support for the women who had come forward during Brand’s criminal trial.

She praised their courage in telling their stories, giving evidence and helping secure convictions.

Goldsmith then revealed that she had her own experience of what she described as Brand’s violence, coercive control and abuse.

One of the most serious details involved an incident at her Oxfordshire home in July 2014.

She said she had to call the police to have Brand removed from the property following a violent confrontation.

Goldsmith explained that she had chosen not to press charges at the time and had not previously spoken publicly about the incident.

Her decision, she said, was influenced by concerns about the effect that press attention could have on her teenage children.

She also emphasised that the experience had left a lasting impact on her life.

Her statement has been widely reported because it provides a personal account from someone who was previously in a relationship with Brand, rather than another allegation arising from his professional environment.

Police Confirm They Attended the Incident

Following Goldsmith’s public statement, Thames Valley Police confirmed that officers had attended an incident involving a woman and her partner in Oxfordshire on 25 July 2014.

The force said it had received a report that the woman had been assaulted.

Officers were dispatched to the address, where they spoke to the woman, listened to her concerns and provided support and advice.

Police also confirmed that they ensured her partner left the property, as she had requested.

The statement is significant because it independently confirms that police attended the address and removed the partner.

However, the police confirmation should not be confused with a criminal conviction relating to the 2014 incident.

Goldsmith has said she did not pursue charges at the time, and the allegations she has now made remain distinct from the offences for which Brand was convicted in 2026.

Nevertheless, the police response has added important context to her account and demonstrated that the incident was not simply a disagreement described years later.

Brand’s Criminal Convictions and Prison Sentence

Goldsmith’s statement came at a particularly significant moment in the legal proceedings against Brand.

The former comedian was found guilty of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault following a trial at Southwark Crown Court.

The offences involved four women and took place between 2004 and 2009.

The jury heard evidence about incidents involving women who had encountered Brand through his entertainment career.

The court also heard accounts of the emotional and psychological consequences experienced by the victims.

Brand denied the charges and maintained that the sexual encounters were consensual.

However, the jury rejected his defence in relation to four counts.

He was acquitted of two additional rape charges and one charge of attempted indecent assault.

On 9 November, he was sentenced to ten years and six months in prison.

During sentencing, the judge criticised his behaviour and the way he had used his celebrity status in his relationships with women.

The convictions have had a significant impact on the public perception of Brand, who previously enjoyed considerable success as a comedian, actor, broadcaster and online personality.

Why Goldsmith Decided to Speak Now

Goldsmith’s decision to make her experience public appears closely connected to the courage demonstrated by the women who testified during Brand’s trial.

She expressed admiration for those who had endured the difficult process of reporting sexual offences and giving evidence in court.

She also revealed that she had helped journalists investigating Brand’s behaviour.

According to her statement, she had provided assistance to reporters involved in exposing allegations against him and had been prepared to testify about his abusive behaviour if the newspaper publishing the victims’ accounts had faced legal action.

Her involvement is particularly significant because the investigation into Brand required journalists to examine years of allegations, speak with multiple women and carefully assess evidence.

Goldsmith’s decision to support that work suggests that her concerns about Brand’s behaviour extended beyond her own relationship.

She also said that she was relieved that he had finally faced justice.

Her comments have prompted renewed discussion about the difficulties women can face when deciding whether to report abusive behaviour, particularly when the individual involved is wealthy, famous or influential.

The Controversial 2014 Injunction

Goldsmith’s statement also addressed renewed media attention surrounding a harassment injunction involving Brand, Goldsmith and another woman, Szilvia Berki.

The controversy dates back to June 2014, when Berki visited Goldsmith’s home to provide Brand with a massage.

Berki subsequently made allegations to police concerning an encounter with Brand.

Goldsmith said she was present during the visit and did not witness anything untoward.

She also stated that police examined the matter and concluded there was no case to answer.

Goldsmith later said that she and Brand experienced threatening communications and online abuse from Berki.

Following legal advice, they sought a harassment injunction.

The injunction subsequently became the subject of renewed reporting after Brand’s criminal convictions.

Goldsmith argued that some recent coverage had presented an inaccurate account of the circumstances and had exposed her to serious online hostility.

She maintained that the injunction was intended to address harassment rather than silence legitimate allegations.

The distinction is important because the existence of a civil injunction does not itself establish whether an allegation of criminal conduct is true or false.

Goldsmith’s account has therefore reopened questions about how the earlier dispute was reported and understood.

More Women Contact Police

The developments surrounding Goldsmith’s allegations have coincided with further reports reaching the Metropolitan Police.

Detectives investigating Brand have confirmed that several people contacted the investigation team during his trial and after the verdict.

The information includes reports of potential criminal allegations that officers are now assessing.

The Metropolitan Police has said that enquiries remain ongoing.

There are also two additional rape allegations being reviewed by the Crown Prosecution Service.

These matters are separate from the four offences for which Brand has already been convicted.

Police have encouraged anyone with relevant information or experience of sexual abuse to come forward.

The investigation demonstrates that the legal consequences surrounding Brand may not be finished.

His conviction has encouraged further public discussion and may have given other potential victims greater confidence to contact investigators.

A Wider Debate About Power and Abuse

The Goldsmith allegations have also reignited a wider debate about the relationship between celebrity, influence and accountability.

For many years, Brand enjoyed a public image built around confidence, humour, sexual openness and outspoken political commentary.

His popularity allowed him to reach enormous audiences through television, radio, comedy performances and social media.

However, his criminal convictions have demonstrated the serious consequences of the conduct established in court.

Goldsmith’s allegations add another perspective to this discussion by highlighting the experiences of someone who knew him personally and was involved in a relationship with him.

Her account also underlines why victims may delay speaking publicly.

Fear of publicity, concern for children, emotional distress and uncertainty about how authorities will respond can all influence decisions about reporting abuse.

The experiences described by Goldsmith and the women involved in the criminal proceedings should be considered individually, without assuming that every allegation has the same legal status.

Conclusion: A Powerful Reminder That No One Is Above Accountability

Jemima Goldsmith’s decision to speak publicly about her relationship with Russell Brand has added another deeply troubling chapter to the controversy surrounding the former comedian.

Her allegations of violence, coercive control and abuse, together with her account of contacting police in 2014, have attracted considerable attention.

The confirmation that officers attended the incident provides important context, although it does not amount to a criminal conviction for the alleged conduct.

Brand’s separate convictions for rape and sexual assault have already resulted in a substantial prison sentence.

Meanwhile, police are continuing to assess further information from people who have come forward.

Goldsmith’s decision to speak after years of silence also highlights the personal difficulties that can prevent people from discussing abusive experiences.

Her concerns about protecting her children and avoiding intense publicity demonstrate that coming forward can involve consequences extending well beyond the individual making the allegations.

Ultimately, the most important issue is the safety, dignity and wellbeing of those affected.

The women who have spoken publicly deserve to be heard, and every allegation must be handled seriously, fairly and according to the law.

The case also sends an important message about accountability: fame, wealth and public influence should never place anyone beyond scrutiny or the reach of justice.