Can Labour’s Clark Kent turn into Britain’s Superman – a very likeable Northern bloke transforming himself into a superhero saving our country?
Bouncing Andy Burnham’s certainly flying high in Downing Street as the nation’s most popular political leader, alone enjoying a net positive approval rating.
The Prime Minister’s +7% personal score is ahead of Kemi Badenoch (-3) and Ed Davey (-4) never mind Zack Polanski (-24) and Nigel Farage (-25).
Ask voters who would make the best PM and a former King of the North now elevated to governing all of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland trounces Badenoch by 20 points and Nigel Farage by 22 points.
Labour’s topping most opinion polls, seat projections forecasting in an immediate General Election it would be the biggest party.
That’s an astonishing turnaround when two months ago Labour looked dead and buried under Keir Starmer and this time last year Burnham himself was run out of Liverpool with his tail between his legs after a premature leadership bid flopped. This week he’s loved by Andy’s Army at a revivalist mustering, all handshakes and hope on the Mersey.
He’s tougher than his critics acknowledge and determined not to waste a single minute of a golden opportunity to rebuild Britain for the better, I was told by an admiring Minister.
Ruling out an early election, emphasising 2029, was smart politics to nail potentially destabilising speculation. Preparing the territory for social care to be a crucial battleground when that showdown comes is astute.
As is acknowledging Labour requires time to convince a misled public wrongly believing net migration and boat people are up when both are significantly down. The economy is the issue he’ll ultimately soar or crash over which is why John Healey’s Budget on October 28 is even more important than Burnham’s keynote speech this week.
So will Burnham remain commendable Clark Kent or emerge as Superman? Being an engaging, down-to-Earth lad eager to improve lives is itself proving a superpower.
Booze own goal
Where Burnham’s lost the crowd is reintroducing boozing at football.
Article continues below
Supporters regularly going to games are two-to-one against (YouGov found 63%-35% opposition) and this Sunderland season card holder is in the majority.
I’m usually against everything Thatcher did but prefer 45 minutes without a pint to a beer shampoo and clothes rinse from drunks spilling ale or, worse, throwing the sticky stuff in the air for goals like we see in fan parks.
The man of the people either listens to people watching men’s matches instead or he’ll be deluged with dry cleaning bills.
Andy Burnham Is Flying High — But Can Labour’s New Superman Really Save Britain?
Andy Burnham has become the central figure in Labour’s political revival, enjoying rising poll ratings and renewed attention after a series of ambitious announcements on the economy, social care, pensions and Britain’s relationship with Europe. Dubbed Labour’s new “Superman” by supporters impressed by his political momentum, the Prime Minister now faces a much bigger challenge: proving that his popularity can translate into lasting improvements for a country struggling with economic uncertainty and declining confidence in politics.
Recent polling has provided encouragement for Labour. An Opinium survey conducted between 30 September and 2 October 2026 put the party on 30 per cent, its highest rating since November 2024. Reform UK stood at 25 per cent, the Conservatives at 17 per cent, the Greens at 11 per cent and the Liberal Democrats at 9 per cent.
The figures suggest that Labour has regained some ground after a difficult period. Burnham has also performed strongly in surveys measuring public attitudes towards individual political leaders. Yet the gap between being popular and delivering successful government remains substantial.
For millions of voters, the real test will not be whether Burnham can dominate the headlines or deliver a compelling speech. It will be whether he can make household finances more manageable, improve public services and offer a convincing sense of direction for Britain’s future.
The rise of Labour’s new political star
Burnham’s political appeal rests partly on his ability to present himself as a politician concerned with everyday experiences rather than Westminster manoeuvring.
His supporters point to his years in public life, including his experience in local government and his previous work in national politics. They argue that he understands the pressures facing communities, particularly in northern England, where concerns about public services, employment opportunities and regional inequality have remained prominent.
His leadership has also brought a change in Labour’s political presentation. Rather than concentrating exclusively on the difficulties inherited from previous governments, Burnham has sought to establish a broader argument about national renewal.
That message has included commitments to strengthen social care, address pension concerns and reconsider the economic consequences of Brexit. It offers voters a combination of practical policy proposals and a more optimistic account of what government might achieve.
The approach appears to have attracted attention. A Survation poll conducted between 3 and 5 October placed Labour on 30 per cent and Reform UK on 24 per cent, with the Conservatives on 19 per cent. The same survey gave Burnham a net favourability rating of plus 19, based on 47 per cent saying they liked him and 28 per cent saying they disliked him.
These results provide evidence of a favourable political moment for Burnham, although individual surveys cannot establish whether that support will endure.
His challenge is to maintain public interest after the initial excitement surrounding a change in leadership. Voters who welcome a new direction will eventually want to see whether the government’s promises are affordable, practical and capable of producing measurable results.
Can Labour turn its polling recovery into lasting support?
Labour’s improved position matters because the party had faced significant difficulties in maintaining public confidence. Rising living costs, dissatisfaction with public services and disputes over government priorities had created opportunities for opposition parties to attract disillusioned voters.
Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, has sought to capitalise on those concerns through its emphasis on immigration, national identity and dissatisfaction with established political institutions.
The Conservatives have also been trying to rebuild their position under Kemi Badenoch, presenting themselves as an alternative on taxation, economic policy and the role of the state.
Burnham’s polling performance therefore represents an important development in the competition between the parties. However, a lead in voting-intention surveys does not guarantee success at a future general election.
Polls are snapshots of opinion, and their results can vary according to methodology, sample size and timing. A surge following a major speech or policy announcement may weaken if voters become disappointed with subsequent decisions.
Labour must also contend with the difference between supporting a leader and approving of the government’s record. Someone who welcomes Burnham’s promises on social care may still disagree with his approach to taxation, immigration or public spending.
The party will need to hold together voters with different priorities while demonstrating that its programme can deliver benefits beyond its existing supporters.
The cost-of-living crisis is the real test
For many households, the most immediate question is whether life is becoming more affordable.
Food, housing, energy, transport and childcare can absorb a substantial share of household income. Even when inflation slows, prices do not necessarily return to their previous levels, leaving families to manage the lasting effects of earlier increases.
People on fixed incomes may find it difficult to adjust their budgets, while younger workers can face the combined pressure of high rents, saving for a home and the cost of everyday essentials.
Businesses face similar uncertainty. Employers must manage operating expenses, wages and investment decisions while trying to remain competitive. Small businesses can be particularly vulnerable when costs rise faster than revenues.
Burnham’s government will therefore need to show how its economic programme can improve living standards without creating new pressures elsewhere.
That is not an easy balance. Tax reductions may leave households with more money but reduce revenue available for public services. Increased spending can improve services and support demand, but it must be financed sustainably. Measures to stimulate investment may take years to produce their full effects.
The government will also have to consider the wider economic environment, including borrowing costs, international instability and the performance of major trading partners.
A successful cost-of-living strategy must go beyond announcing temporary relief. It needs to address the underlying conditions that affect wages, productivity, housing supply and household security.
Social care: a defining promise
One of Burnham’s most personal political commitments concerns social care, an issue he has discussed following the death of his father, who lived with Alzheimer’s disease.
The experience has reinforced his determination to reform a system that often leaves families struggling to arrange support and understand how much care will cost.
In England, social care arrangements differ from NHS treatment because eligibility for publicly funded assistance is generally subject to financial assessments. Some people and families must therefore pay substantial sums towards home support or residential care.
The system can be confusing, particularly when relatives are trying to make decisions during a medical or family crisis. Families may also find themselves providing unpaid care while balancing employment and other responsibilities.
Burnham has promoted the idea of a National Care Service, intended to create a more consistent approach to support and improve coordination between health and social care.
The ambition could help people receive assistance before their circumstances become critical. Better coordination could also ease pressure on hospitals when patients are unable to leave because suitable support is unavailable.
But the financial and practical questions are considerable. The government must determine how much of the system would be publicly funded, how eligibility would work and how to recruit and retain enough care workers.
It must also explain how reform would be paid for alongside commitments to the NHS, education and other public services.
Burnham’s personal commitment may help keep social care on the political agenda. The ultimate measure of success, however, will be whether families can obtain reliable support without facing avoidable hardship.
Brexit and the future of Britain’s relationship with Europe
Burnham has also reopened the debate over Britain’s relationship with the European Union.
On 12 October, he called for a serious dialogue about the post-Brexit settlement, arguing that the existing arrangements were not good enough. A UK-EU summit scheduled for 20 November is expected to provide an opportunity to discuss areas of practical cooperation.
Potential areas include food and drink regulations, energy cooperation, emissions trading and youth mobility. Supporters of closer ties argue that reducing unnecessary barriers could help businesses, improve economic cooperation and make it easier to address shared challenges.
However, the debate remains politically sensitive. Brexit was the outcome of the 2016 referendum, and voters continue to disagree about whether leaving the EU has benefited Britain.
Some want closer economic integration, while others fear that reopening the issue could undermine the referendum result or create uncertainty for businesses.
Burnham’s approach will require careful negotiation. He must explain what closer cooperation could achieve, which arrangements would require compromises and how the government intends to respect its existing commitments.
Any agreement would also depend on the willingness of European partners to negotiate terms that both sides consider beneficial.
The economic case for closer relations will need to be demonstrated through concrete outcomes rather than broad claims about growth. At the same time, the government must recognise that European policy is about sovereignty, regulation and political identity as well as trade.
Public services cannot be transformed overnight
The NHS remains another major test of Burnham’s leadership.
Patients want timely appointments, shorter waits for treatment and confidence that emergency services will be available when needed. Staff need manageable workloads, appropriate facilities and the resources to deliver safe care.
These problems cannot be resolved through a single announcement. Improvements require effective planning, recruitment, investment and changes to the way services are organised.
Social care reform is closely connected to this challenge. When suitable support is unavailable outside hospitals, patients can remain in hospital beds longer than medically necessary. Better community services may help prevent some admissions and support safer discharges.
Education and local government present similarly complex demands. Schools require sufficient resources and experienced staff, while councils face responsibilities involving housing, social care, transport and local infrastructure.
Burnham will have to prioritise these competing needs while explaining the limits of available public finances.
The government also needs to establish realistic timetables. If ministers promise rapid improvements that prove impossible to deliver, the resulting disappointment could weaken the public confidence they are trying to rebuild.
Nigel Farage remains a challenge for Labour
Despite Labour’s recovery in some polls, Farage and Reform UK remain significant competitors.
Reform has appealed to voters who feel that immigration is poorly managed, that established parties have ignored their concerns or that national institutions have become disconnected from ordinary life.
Burnham’s approach may attract some voters who want a change in direction without supporting Reform. His emphasis on public services and economic renewal offers a different response to dissatisfaction with the political system.
However, Labour cannot assume that a rise in its polling figures means the concerns motivating Reform supporters have disappeared.
Immigration, housing pressures, public spending and regional inequality will continue to influence political debate. The government will need to demonstrate that it can address those issues effectively rather than simply criticising its opponents.
Farage, meanwhile, will seek to question whether Burnham’s promises can be financed and delivered. Reform’s ability to maintain support will depend partly on its own policies and organisation, but also on whether Labour can demonstrate visible progress.
The competition is therefore likely to revolve around credibility as much as personalities.
The danger of the Superman label
Calling Burnham Labour’s new Superman may capture the excitement of a political revival, but it also creates unrealistic expectations if taken too literally.
No prime minister can resolve every national problem quickly. Economic conditions are influenced by international events, public services have long-standing structural difficulties and major reforms frequently require years of preparation.
The danger for Labour is that strong personal popularity could encourage supporters to expect immediate transformation. If the government cannot meet those expectations, disappointment may be sharper than it would have been under a less ambitious political narrative.
Burnham will need to show that optimism can coexist with honesty about the constraints facing government.
That means acknowledging when policies take time, explaining difficult financial decisions and correcting mistakes when necessary. It also means distinguishing between promises that can be delivered quickly and changes that require sustained investment.
Political leadership is not simply about inspiring people to believe that change is possible. It is also about building the institutions, budgets and administrative capacity needed to make that change real.
Can Andy Burnham save Britain?
Burnham’s early polling performance gives Labour an opportunity to rebuild confidence, but it does not settle the question of whether his government can transform the country.
The party faces a difficult combination of economic pressure, public-service challenges, disagreement over immigration and continuing uncertainty about Britain’s future relationship with Europe.
Its success will depend on whether it can make progress across these areas without losing public trust or promising more than it can deliver.
The next Budget, expected on 28 October, will be an important test of the government’s economic priorities. Labour must decide how to balance support for households and businesses with the need to maintain credible public finances.
Over the longer term, social care reform and improvements to public services will provide a measure of whether Burnham’s wider ambitions are translating into practical results.
For now, the polling suggests that many voters are willing to give Labour’s new leadership a hearing. That is an opportunity, not a guarantee.
Burnham does not need to be a political Superman to succeed. He needs a realistic programme, a capable government, clear communication and the willingness to make difficult choices openly.
If Labour can deliver tangible improvements in living standards, healthcare and social care, its current momentum may become more durable. If the promises remain largely rhetorical, the political mood could change just as quickly as it improved.
Ultimately, Britain will not be saved by a nickname or a favourable poll. The decisive question is whether Burnham’s government can turn public expectations into results that people experience in their homes, workplaces and communities.