“Shambolic” Reform UK has lost over 50 newly-elected councillors in just over five months, new figures show.
Article continues below
Nigel Farage’s party is losing a member of the 2026 intake every three days on average due to resignations, defections and suspensions, according to an online tracker.
Article continues below
The latest update raises questions about Mr Farage’s ability to lead a party into government. A tracker set up by campaign group Best For Britain reveals Reform has shed 51 council representatives who were elected in May.
Julia Meadon, the group’s director of digital, told The Mirror: “We’ve been closely monitoring Reform UK’s shambolic approach to local government – and surprise, surprise, their councillors are quitting and being turfed out in their droves.
“While Farage slurps oysters and sips champagne with billionaires, the people elected to represent Britain’s communities – who said they could be trusted to take care of the vulnerable, to run our libraries, and keep our streets clean – are walking out the door.
“Just imagine what they’d do if trusted with our economy, our NHS and our armed forces.”
Among recent resignations is Solihull councillor Eleonora Gough, who said the local group had become “divisive and unprofessional rather than constructive”. In her resignation letter last month she said: “I am not the first to reach this conclusion and I doubt I will be the last. My decision is final.”
And three representatives walked away from the Reform group in Plymouth last month – two joining Restore Britain and one becoming an independent. Last month Newcastle councillor Daniel Astley was expelled from the party after previous links to the far-right Homeland Party came to light.
He said in a statement: “On the Homeland Party, I do not accept the characterisation of ‘extremist’ given, as mentioned, I believe their policies at the time to have been very close to Reform’s policies now. I have not had any contact with them since last year, I have never worked on policy, attended a conference or organised elections for them.”
Those currently suspended include Sunderland City councillor Glenn Gibbins, 66, who has been charged with posting a grossly offensive comment about Nigerians on social media.
He was first suspended by Reform in May after the post came to light, but then reinstated. However he was suspended again after legal proceedings started.
Article continues below
Reform UK gained 1,451 councillors and took control of 14 councils across England in May this year. Back in August, when the tracker was launched, Best For Britain’s chief executive Naomi Smith told The Mirror: “Whether they’ve resigned, been suspended, or were simply never up to the job, Reform UK have been shedding councillors ever since May.
“So much for the tidal wave about to break over British politics, this is a party that would struggle to run a bath.”
The Mirror has contacted Reform UK for comment.
Nigel Farage Faces Fresh Pressure as Reform UK Loses 51 Newly Elected Councillors in Five Months
Nigel Farage is facing renewed questions about the leadership and organisation of Reform UK after figures revealed that 51 councillors elected under the party’s banner in May 2026 had quit, defected or been suspended within just over five months. The departures have raised concerns about the party’s ability to retain representatives and maintain a consistent political organisation as it seeks to expand its influence across Britain.
The figures, highlighted by an online tracker established by campaign group Best for Britain, suggest that Reform has struggled to keep every member of its latest intake within the party. The losses have come after a period of significant electoral expansion, when Reform secured a large number of council seats and presented itself as a serious challenger to Labour and the Conservatives.
For Farage, the challenge is not simply about the number of councillors who have left. It is also about whether the party can turn electoral success into stable local government, effective representation and a credible long-term political operation.
A Rapid Rise Followed by Difficult Questions
Reform UK entered the May 2026 local elections with considerable momentum. The party campaigned on issues including immigration, public spending, local services and dissatisfaction with the established political parties. Its message attracted voters who felt that Labour and the Conservatives had failed to address their concerns.
The election results gave Reform a substantially larger presence in local government. Winning council seats provided the party with opportunities to influence local decisions, challenge existing administrations and demonstrate how its policies might work in practice.
However, rapid expansion brings organisational challenges. A party that suddenly gains hundreds or thousands of representatives must ensure that its councillors understand their responsibilities, follow appropriate procedures and work effectively with colleagues.
The 51 departures recorded by the Best for Britain tracker include different circumstances. Some councillors resigned, others defected, and some were suspended. These categories should not be treated as identical, because the reasons behind an individual’s departure can vary considerably.
Nevertheless, the overall figure raises a question about the party’s ability to retain members after an election victory.
For a political organisation seeking to establish itself nationally, keeping elected representatives engaged and accountable is an important part of building a lasting presence. Electoral success may attract new members, but the subsequent work of local government requires time, discipline and cooperation.
Why Are Councillors Leaving?
There is no single explanation that necessarily accounts for every departure from Reform UK. The reasons reported in individual cases have varied, ranging from disputes within the party to disciplinary action and personal decisions.
Some councillors have left following disagreements over the party’s direction or their experiences of local political management. Others have faced suspension or expulsion after controversies surrounding their conduct or public statements.
Such cases illustrate the difficulty of managing a rapidly expanding group of elected representatives. When a party recruits candidates quickly to contest large numbers of seats, the process of checking backgrounds, assessing suitability and ensuring that candidates understand the responsibilities of office becomes particularly important.
The challenge is not unique to Reform UK. Established political parties have also experienced resignations, suspensions, defections and internal disputes. The difference in Reform’s case is that its recent expansion has brought a large number of relatively new representatives into local government within a short period.
The party must now demonstrate that it can develop the internal systems required to support those representatives.
It is also important to avoid assuming that all councillors who leave do so because of dissatisfaction with Farage personally. Some departures may reflect individual circumstances, while others may involve disagreements at council level rather than a fundamental rejection of the party’s national leadership.
Understanding the reasons requires examining each case separately rather than treating every departure as evidence of the same underlying problem.
The Challenge of Managing a Growing Party
Reform UK has built much of its political appeal around the argument that Britain’s established parties have become disconnected from ordinary voters. Farage has repeatedly sought to present his party as an alternative to the traditional political establishment.
That message helped Reform attract support from voters dissatisfied with the Conservatives and Labour. But running a political organisation is different from campaigning against opponents.
A successful campaign can be built around a small number of clear messages. Local government, by contrast, involves complicated decisions about budgets, roads, housing, waste collection, planning, social care and public services.
Councillors must also work within legal frameworks and established administrative procedures. They need to understand the limits of council powers, examine financial proposals and cooperate with officers who manage the practical delivery of services.
For a party with a rapidly growing group of representatives, providing consistent training and guidance is essential.
If councillors lack adequate support, misunderstand their responsibilities or become involved in disputes with colleagues, the party risks losing both personnel and public confidence. Equally, if internal disciplinary processes are unclear or perceived as unfair, disagreements can deepen rather than resolve.
Reform therefore faces a balancing act: maintaining standards without discouraging legitimate disagreement, while ensuring that elected representatives understand the expectations attached to their positions.
The loss of 51 councillors does not, by itself, prove that the party’s entire local government operation is failing. It does, however, make the question of organisational stability harder to ignore.
Farage’s Response and the Importance of Local Representation
Farage has previously acknowledged that not every person elected under Reform’s banner would necessarily prove suitable for the party over the longer term. In comments about departures and the changing composition of council groups, he has compared the process to establishing a new company, in which some people will not remain after the initial period of expansion.
That argument reflects a practical reality: political parties cannot expect every new representative to remain indefinitely. Personal circumstances change, disagreements emerge and disciplinary action may sometimes be necessary.
However, the scale and frequency of departures matter when a party has only recently gained a much larger role in local government.
Voters elect councillors to represent their communities, not simply to participate in a national political movement. When representatives resign from a party or become independents, residents may question whether the promises made during the election campaign will still be delivered.
A councillor who leaves a party does not automatically lose the ability to represent local residents. In some cases, an independent representative may continue working effectively on local issues. In other cases, a departure can disrupt a council group, complicate decision-making or weaken the party’s position in a particular authority.
The consequences depend on the circumstances of each council and the number of seats involved.
For Farage, the broader task is to show that Reform can manage these transitions without allowing local disputes to overshadow its policy agenda.
The Situation in County Durham
Questions about Reform’s ability to manage local government have also emerged in County Durham, where the party initially secured a substantial majority.
According to ITV News Tyne Tees, Reform’s majority on Durham County Council had fallen from 65 seats to 50 since May 2025, although the council remained under Reform control. Farage argued that the position was safer than some reports suggested and said that some independent councillors continued to support the party.
He also acknowledged that not all of the people elected under Reform’s banner had proved suitable.
The Durham situation illustrates why the headline number of departing councillors needs context. A party can lose representatives and still retain control of a council, depending on the original majority and the distribution of seats.
At the same time, departures can affect the way a council operates even when its administration remains in power. A smaller majority may change the balance of internal discussions, increase the importance of cooperation and make future electoral contests more consequential.
The central issue is therefore not simply whether Reform loses seats, but whether it can maintain effective leadership and deliver on the commitments it made to voters.
Could the Departures Damage Reform’s National Ambitions?
Reform’s national ambitions depend on more than opinion polls and election-night results. The party also needs a network of representatives capable of demonstrating that its approach to public administration can work in practice.
Local councils provide an important test of political promises. They deal with everyday matters that directly affect residents, from the condition of roads and public spaces to planning decisions and local spending priorities.
If Reform-led councils deliver visible improvements, the party can point to those results as evidence that it is prepared to govern. If internal disagreements, resignations or administrative problems dominate public attention, its opponents will argue that the party has not yet demonstrated the organisational capacity required for wider responsibilities.
However, the departure figures alone cannot establish how voters will respond at future elections. Local political outcomes depend on many factors, including the quality of individual candidates, local circumstances, the performance of competing parties and residents’ experiences of council services.
It would therefore be premature to conclude that the departures will necessarily translate into electoral losses.
The more immediate question is whether Reform can learn from the problems that have emerged and strengthen its approach to candidate selection, training and internal management.
Candidate Selection Under Scrutiny
One possible lesson from the departures concerns the process through which candidates are selected.
Political parties often face pressure to recruit enough candidates to contest a large number of seats. That pressure becomes particularly intense when a party experiences a sudden surge in support and has opportunities to win far more seats than it previously held.
Yet recruitment numbers are only one measure of success. A candidate’s suitability, understanding of local government and willingness to follow party standards can be just as important.
Thorough vetting may reduce the risk of controversies involving past conduct or public statements. Training can help new councillors understand council procedures, while clear disciplinary rules can establish how complaints and disagreements should be handled.
These measures cannot eliminate every dispute. Nor should political parties attempt to prevent legitimate criticism or automatically treat disagreement as disloyalty.
Instead, an effective organisation needs transparent expectations and fair procedures. Councillors should know what is expected of them, how decisions are made and what options are available when conflicts arise.
For Reform, improving these systems could be particularly important as the party continues to recruit candidates and seek further electoral gains.
What Does This Mean for Reform Supporters?
For people who voted for Reform because they wanted change in local government, the departures raise practical questions about representation and accountability.
Residents may want to know whether their councillors remain committed to the issues discussed during the campaign, whether council services are improving and whether local decisions are being made effectively.
The party’s national leadership may focus on its wider political programme, but local voters often judge representatives on more immediate concerns.
A councillor’s departure from Reform does not automatically mean that the promises made to residents will be abandoned. Equally, retaining the party label does not guarantee effective representation.
The most useful assessment is based on what councillors actually do: how they scrutinise spending, respond to residents, attend meetings and contribute to decisions affecting their communities.
This is why local performance remains important regardless of national political arguments. Parties can gain attention through strong campaign messages, but maintaining public trust requires evidence of competent and accountable representation.
A Test of Organisation and Leadership
The loss of 51 councillors in just over five months represents a significant organisational challenge for Reform UK, particularly after the party’s substantial electoral expansion in May 2026.
The figures highlight the distinction between winning office and building a stable political organisation. Reform has demonstrated that it can attract voters and elect large numbers of representatives, but it must also show that those representatives can remain effective and work within a coherent structure.
Farage’s explanation that not every newly elected councillor will prove suitable may account for some turnover. Yet the party will still need to examine whether its recruitment, training and management processes are adequate for its expanded responsibilities.
The departures should not be interpreted as proof that Reform cannot govern, nor should the party be judged solely by the number of people who have left. The circumstances of individual cases, the performance of Reform-led councils and the experiences of local residents all matter.
Nevertheless, the figures provide a clear reason to scrutinise how the party handles rapid growth.
Reform UK now faces a test that goes beyond its ability to challenge Labour and the Conservatives in national politics. It must demonstrate that it can maintain discipline, resolve disagreements fairly and turn electoral gains into effective local representation.
For Nigel Farage, the challenge is to ensure that the party’s growing political footprint is matched by a stable and capable organisation. Whether Reform can achieve that will become clearer as its councillors continue their work and voters assess the results in their communities.