Nigel Farage has vowed five deportation flights a day (Image: Getty)
Nigel Farage has vowed that, if he becomes Prime Minister, five deportation flights would leave the UK every day under a radical plan to tackle illegal immigration. The Reform UK leader warned Britain was facing a “massive crisis” and insisted that detention and deportation are the only ways to regain control of the country’s borders.
At the heart of the proposal, Operation Restoring Justice, is emergency legislation known as the Illegal Migration (Mass Deportation) Bill. It would bar anyone arriving in the UK by small boats from claiming asylum and require them to be held in detention centres on surplus RAF and military bases.
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
A boat carrying migrants across the English Channel (Image: Getty)
Mr Farage told The Times: “These facilities, capable of housing 24,000 people within 18 months, would be basic prefabricated buildings with minimal amenities. Detainees would be barred from leaving or applying for bail.
“The message is simple. If you come, you won’t stay. Paying a trafficker to cross the Channel will not secure you a future in Britain.”
Reform UK intends to strike agreements with countries such as Afghanistan and Eritrea to return migrants, despite serious concerns about human rights abuses in both nations.
As a backup, Clacton MP Mr Farage suggested: “We could send people to third countries like Rwanda and Albania, or use British overseas territories such as Ascension Island as temporary holding sites.
“We would also offer a voluntary returns scheme, giving migrants £2,500 to deport themselves on government-paid flights within six months.”
The party estimates the plan will cost £10 billion over five years but argues it would ultimately save the government money by cutting £7 billion a year currently spent on asylum hotels and support.
Mr Farage said: “Anyone who attempts to return to the UK after deportation or destroys their identity documents will face criminal charges. The government must be tough and uncompromising to deter illegal migration.”
Reform UK would also replace the European Convention on Human Rights with a British Bill of Rights, Mr Farage stressed. He said: “This would prioritise citizens over foreigners while using terms such as liberty and freedom. It is necessary to ensure parliament retains sovereignty and to remove legal obstacles to deportation.”
The scale of Mr Farage’s proposals is unprecedented, with the party promising a dramatic expansion of detention capacity. Military bases and temporary facilities would be repurposed to house thousands of migrants under strict supervision.
Rows of dinghies in Kent underline the scale of the problem (Image: Getty)
Mr Farage said: “We cannot allow the UK to be overwhelmed. These measures are about ensuring that our borders are respected and that those who break our laws face consequences.”
The plan relies heavily on international agreements, using diplomatic leverage and financial incentives to encourage countries to accept the return of failed asylum seekers.
Mr Farage said: “We will use every tool at our disposal to reach agreements with governments. Our priority is returning people safely but firmly, so the message is clear: the UK is not an open door for illegal arrivals.”
Critics argue the proposals face serious legal, logistical, and political obstacles. Courts could block deportations to countries with documented human rights abuses, and overseas territories such as Ascension Island would require major infrastructure work before they could hold large numbers of people.
Mr Farage said: “We are under no illusion about the challenges, but inaction is not an option. The British people expect their government to take decisive steps to protect the nation.”
The proposals have already sparked protests outside facilities housing asylum seekers, with Mr Farage encouraging peaceful demonstrations.
He explained: “People are frustrated and rightly concerned. Peaceful protest is their right, but we cannot allow illegal migration to continue unchecked.”
As the next general election approaches, Reform UK is positioning immigration as the central issue. Mr Farage said: “This is about taking back control and sending an unmistakable signal: Britain’s borders, laws, and people come first. We will act decisively, and those who attempt to circumvent the system will face the consequences.”
Nigel Farage Vows Reform Will Run ‘5 Deportation Flights a Day’ in £10bn Immigration Plan
Nigel Farage has placed mass deportation at the centre of Reform UK’s immigration strategy, promising that a Reform government would dramatically increase the number of people removed from Britain and could operate as many as five deportation flights every day.
The proposal forms part of what Reform has described as a five-year emergency programme to identify, detain and deport people it classifies as illegal migrants. The party says the programme would cost approximately £10 billion, while arguing that ending the current system of asylum accommodation and other immigration-related expenditure would eventually produce substantial savings.
The scale of the proposal would represent a major expansion of the UK’s existing deportation operation.
According to Reform’s published policy, a new UK Deportation Command would be created, detention capacity would be expanded rapidly and the Home Office would charter up to five flights a day. The party says return agreements with other countries would be pursued as a priority, with visa sanctions available against governments that refused to accept their nationals.
The announcement has intensified an already fierce political argument over immigration, asylum and Britain’s border controls.
Five flights every day
The most striking element of Farage’s proposal is its sheer scale.
Five deportation flights every day would amount to as many as 1,825 chartered flights in a year. Reform’s plan has been described as capable of removing up to 288,000 people annually once the proposed system was fully operational.
That would be dramatically larger than Britain’s existing removal programme.
The Independent reported in August 2025 that the Labour government had chartered 46 deportation flights since coming to power, based on Home Office figures available at the time. The newspaper calculated that five flights a day would represent an increase of several thousand per cent compared with that level.
Reform’s argument is that the existing system has failed to provide an effective enough deterrent to illegal entry.
Farage has repeatedly focused on small-boat arrivals across the English Channel, arguing that people who enter Britain illegally should not be allowed to remain while lengthy legal processes continue.
His proposed response is therefore based on much greater detention capacity, faster decision-making and a significantly larger deportation operation.
The £10 billion price tag
Reform has put a £10 billion figure on its five-year immigration programme.
The party argues that the cost should be viewed alongside the expenditure associated with the existing asylum system. Its policy proposes closing what it regards as expensive accommodation arrangements, increasing detention capacity and creating a dedicated deportation organisation. Reform says the changes would ultimately save taxpayers money.
Farage has also argued that voluntary returns could form part of the strategy.
Under the proposal outlined to The Times, people without legal status could be offered financial assistance to return voluntarily, with Farage discussing a payment of £2,500 alongside travel costs. Those who refused to leave would face compulsory removal under the proposed system.
However, the financial calculations have attracted scrutiny.
The Independent’s analysis of the proposal questioned whether the £10 billion figure would be sufficient once the cost of flights, detention facilities, staffing and international arrangements were taken into account. It estimated that deportation flights alone could cost billions of pounds annually depending on the number of people removed and the cost per person.
Other analysis has also challenged Reform’s estimates. Byline Times argued that the economic and administrative costs could be substantially higher than Reform’s calculations. Those figures are an independent analysis rather than an official government costing, and should therefore be treated as an assessment rather than a settled estimate.
A new deportation command
At the heart of Reform’s proposal is the creation of a UK Deportation Command.
The organisation would effectively become a dedicated national enforcement body responsible for identifying people without a legal right to remain, arranging detention and organising removals.
Reform says the new command would have access to all available state resources needed to locate and deport illegal migrants. Its published policy also proposes rapidly constructing new detention facilities.
In February 2026, Reform further described plans for an agency resembling the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement model. The Guardian reported that the proposed organisation would have capacity to detain 24,000 migrants at any one time and facilitate removals on the scale of five flights per day.
That would require a major expansion from current detention capacity.
The challenge is not simply building accommodation. Immigration detention requires security staff, medical services, transport, legal administration and systems for determining whether an individual can actually be removed.
Every case would also involve questions about nationality, documentation, legal appeals and the willingness of another country to accept the person being returned.
The international problem
This is where the proposal encounters one of its biggest practical difficulties.
A government cannot simply decide that every person it wants to deport can immediately be placed on an aircraft and returned.
Countries need to accept their nationals, and some people may lack valid identity documents. Others may claim that returning them would expose them to persecution or serious danger.
Farage has said that Reform would negotiate return agreements with countries including Afghanistan, Iran and Eritrea. The party’s policy also proposes sanctions against governments that refuse to accept their nationals.
Whether such agreements could actually be negotiated is a separate question.
Former attorney general Dominic Grieve told The Independent that countries might be unwilling to accept large numbers of people being returned and that identification could itself present difficulties, particularly when individuals lack documentation.
This means the success of the five-flights-a-day promise would depend partly on international diplomacy.
It would not be enough to have aircraft available.
Britain would need countries willing to receive the people being removed.
The ECHR question
Reform’s immigration policy also involves a major constitutional issue.
The party says it would leave the European Convention on Human Rights, repeal the Human Rights Act and introduce new legislation preventing people who enter Britain illegally from claiming asylum.
This would represent a fundamental change to Britain’s current legal framework.
The proposal is based on the argument that existing human-rights protections restrict the government’s ability to remove people quickly.
Critics, however, argue that leaving the ECHR would create significant legal and diplomatic consequences.
Dominic Grieve has argued that withdrawing from international agreements would not necessarily remove every legal obstacle to deportation. He pointed to the possibility of domestic courts intervening in individual cases where deportation could expose someone to serious danger.
The dispute therefore goes beyond immigration policy.
It is also about the relationship between Parliament, ministers and the courts.
What happens to asylum claims?
Another major element of Reform’s proposal concerns asylum itself.
The party says people who enter the country illegally would be prevented from claiming asylum and would instead face detention and removal.
That proposal would require significant changes to existing law and Britain’s current international commitments.
The distinction between irregular entry and the merits of an asylum claim is central to the issue. A person arriving without prior permission may still raise a claim for international protection under the current legal framework.
Reform’s proposal would change that framework fundamentally.
Supporters argue that such a change would remove what they regard as an incentive for people to make dangerous journeys across the Channel.
Opponents argue that it could prevent genuine refugees from accessing protection.
The political debate consequently centres on two competing principles: stronger control over irregular migration and continued access to asylum protections.
Detention on a much larger scale
Reform’s plans would also require a huge increase in immigration detention.
The party has proposed creating capacity for up to 24,000 people, including through the conversion of former military sites.
That is substantially greater than existing capacity.
Detention is expensive because facilities require permanent security, healthcare, administration and transport arrangements.
The Independent reported that Home Office figures put the average cost of immigration detention at more than £133 per person per day, compared with lower average costs for some other forms of asylum accommodation.
Reform’s calculation therefore depends heavily on the assumption that people can be processed and removed quickly.
If individuals remain in detention for extended periods because return agreements, legal challenges or identity checks take time, the costs could rise significantly.
Small boats remain the political driving force
Despite the complexity of the proposals, the political motivation is straightforward.
The small-boats crisis has become one of the most visible symbols of Britain’s immigration debate.
Reform argues that successive governments have failed to establish sufficient control over the Channel and that people-smuggling gangs have exploited weaknesses in the asylum system.
Its own current policy goes beyond deportation. Reform proposes an operation called Operation Fortress under which the Royal Navy, supported by civilian authorities, would intercept migrant boats entering the Channel and return those on board to France or Belgium under escort.
Together, the proposals represent a much broader attempt to reshape Britain’s border policy.
The objective is not merely to remove people after they arrive.
It is to deter people from attempting the journey in the first place.
The political stakes
Farage’s five-flights-a-day promise has inevitably become one of the most controversial parts of Reform’s immigration platform.
For supporters, the proposal represents a clear commitment to enforcement after years of frustration over small boats, asylum accommodation and illegal immigration.
For critics, the scale raises questions about cost, legality, international cooperation and the treatment of people who may have legitimate protection claims.
Neither side can resolve those questions simply through political rhetoric.
The practical test would be whether a future government could establish the necessary legislation, detention facilities, administrative machinery and international agreements required to make the policy operational.
There is also the question of parliamentary support.
Leaving the ECHR, changing asylum law and creating a new deportation command would require major legislative action. The government’s ability to implement such changes would depend on the composition of Parliament and the outcome of legal challenges.
A radically different immigration model
Farage’s proposal is therefore more than a promise to increase deportations.
It represents a proposed restructuring of Britain’s entire immigration enforcement system.
Five deportation flights a day, 24,000 detention places, a new UK Deportation Command, international return agreements and withdrawal from the ECHR would collectively represent a dramatic departure from the current system.
Whether the £10 billion estimate is sufficient is disputed. Whether every proposed deportation could legally and practically be carried out is also contested.
But one thing is clear: immigration has become a defining issue in the political debate, and Reform UK has chosen to make the scale and speed of deportation a central part of its response.
The promise of five flights every day is deliberately simple to understand.
Delivering it would be considerably more complicated.
It would require legislation, money, personnel, detention infrastructure and cooperation from foreign governments. It would also require the government to resolve difficult questions surrounding asylum, human rights and individual legal protections.
For Farage and Reform, the policy is presented as a fundamental attempt to restore control over Britain’s borders.
For its critics, the same plan raises serious questions about legality, cost and feasibility.
The coming political debate will therefore not only concern how many people Britain removes.
It will also concern how far a government should go to achieve that objective — and whether the proposed system can operate effectively within the legal, financial and international constraints facing the United Kingdom.