Farage is likely to be celebrating a historic round of wins on Friday (Image: Getty)
Reform UK is on course for a landmark haul of seats in the 2026 local elections, with party chairman David Bull telling the BBC the party’s ascent had been “meteoric.”
Bull said voters on the doorstep were declaring “two party politics are dead” and that both Labour and the Conservatives were “in trouble.”
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
He told the BBC that anything between 800 and 900 English seats would constitute a “great night,” with 1,000 representing “a measure of success.”
He insisted the vote — local in name only — should be read as “a referendum on the Labour Party.”
At the time of writing Sky News reported 11 seats for Reform, against 11 losses for Labour including in former bastions such as Chorley, and Runcorn and Helsby indicating the northern Red Wall was indeed falling to Nigel Farage‘s party.
The losses are already mounting — a Labour insider conceded to the BBC that Tameside, a council the party has controlled without interruption since 1979, had fallen.
A Reform source declared to the Sun on Sunday: “The Red Wall is crumbling and turning Reform tonight.”
How are the Conservatives faring in the 2026 local elections?
On the Conservative benches, shadow transport secretary Richard Holden conceded “significant losses” were inevitable, without being drawn on specific numbers.
He struck a more optimistic note on Badenoch’s personal ratings, saying she was registering “positive” feedback from voters.
What are the Greens and Lib Dems saying about the results?
Green Party deputy leader Rachel Millward said the Greens represented “an alternative that’s hope based” for voters feeling “such dissatisfaction and anger with the status quo,” adding that the party wanted to “make a difference to ordinary people’s lives.”
Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney predicted a “really good set of results” for her party, arguing that voters were “getting really frustrated with the traditional two parties” — but dismissed both Reform and the Greens as “populist” and “quite extremist.”
Reform UK Hails ‘Meteoric’ Results as Voters ‘Switch’ from Labour to Nigel Farage’s Party
Reform UK has hailed what it describes as “meteoric” electoral progress, arguing that a growing number of voters who previously supported Labour are now turning towards Nigel Farage’s party. The development has added another layer of uncertainty to Britain’s rapidly changing political landscape, with traditional party loyalties appearing increasingly fluid in some parts of the country.
The rise of Reform UK has been one of the most closely watched developments in British politics in recent years. Once viewed largely as a protest movement concentrated around issues such as Brexit and immigration, the party has sought to broaden its appeal and establish itself as a serious political force. Its growing support has placed pressure on both Labour and the Conservatives, while also challenging assumptions about how Britain’s political map will develop.
Reform supporters point to recent electoral performances as evidence that the party is moving beyond its traditional base. In particular, the suggestion that some Labour voters are switching allegiance has attracted considerable attention. Such movement would be politically significant because Labour has historically relied on working-class communities across many parts of England and Wales. If a meaningful proportion of those voters were to reconsider their support, the consequences could extend well beyond individual contests.
Nigel Farage has played a central role in Reform UK’s expansion. A familiar figure in British politics, Farage has built his reputation around issues including immigration, national sovereignty, taxation, regulation and dissatisfaction with the established political parties. Since returning to frontline politics, he has attempted to present Reform UK not simply as a vehicle for protest but as an alternative governing force.
The party’s message has resonated with voters who believe that mainstream politicians have failed to address concerns about the cost of living, public services, immigration and economic growth. Reform UK has also sought to appeal to people who feel disconnected from Westminster politics and believe that the major parties have become too similar.
For Labour, the possibility of voters moving towards Reform UK represents a particularly important challenge. Labour won the 2024 general election with a large parliamentary majority, but the result also revealed significant changes in voter behaviour. The party secured government while receiving a relatively modest share of the national vote compared with the scale of its parliamentary representation. Reform UK, meanwhile, won a smaller number of seats but demonstrated significant support in several constituencies.
Since taking office, Labour has faced difficult political and economic questions. The government has had to balance promises on public services and living standards with fiscal constraints, while also dealing with pressure over migration and public-sector reform. For some voters, these issues have contributed to disappointment with the government.
Reform UK has attempted to capitalise on that dissatisfaction. Its politicians frequently argue that voters who supported Labour because they wanted change are now questioning whether the government has delivered enough of it. The party has particularly targeted communities where concerns over immigration, taxation and economic insecurity overlap.
However, the idea of a straightforward mass movement from Labour to Reform requires careful examination. British voters do not necessarily move directly from one party to another. Electoral support can shift because people abstain, change their minds between elections, support smaller parties or respond differently to individual candidates and local circumstances.
The political environment is therefore more complicated than a simple Labour-to-Reform transfer. Nevertheless, evidence of changing voting patterns can be politically important even when it does not amount to a permanent realignment.
Reform UK has also benefited from dissatisfaction among some former Conservative voters. The Conservatives suffered a major setback at the 2024 general election, losing hundreds of seats after years of political turbulence. Reform UK emerged from the election with five MPs, but its national vote share was considerably larger than its parliamentary representation. That gap highlighted the potential importance of electoral geography under the first-past-the-post system.
The party has subsequently worked to strengthen its local organisation and increase its presence in councils. Local elections offer Reform UK an opportunity to demonstrate whether national support can be translated into sustained electoral organisation. Success at the local level can also provide councillors, activists and political visibility that may strengthen a party ahead of future parliamentary contests.
The language used by Reform UK about “meteoric” progress reflects the party’s confidence in this expansion. Supporters see electoral gains as evidence that the political establishment is being challenged from outside the traditional two-party system. They argue that Reform UK is increasingly capable of competing in areas that were previously considered secure territory for Labour or the Conservatives.
Critics, however, question whether strong results in particular elections necessarily indicate a permanent shift in British politics. Local contests can be influenced by turnout, candidate recognition, national political events and individual council issues. A party can perform strongly in one election without immediately establishing a durable nationwide base.
There is also the question of whether Reform UK can convert protest support into support for a full governing programme. As the party becomes more prominent, voters are likely to examine its policies in greater detail. Questions about taxation, public spending, healthcare, immigration, housing, education and Britain’s international relationships all become increasingly important when a party presents itself as a potential government.
For Nigel Farage, this creates both an opportunity and a challenge. His political profile provides Reform UK with substantial public recognition. He is an experienced campaigner and communicator, and his ability to attract media attention has helped keep the party at the centre of political debate.
At the same time, greater visibility means greater scrutiny. Statements made by Farage and other Reform politicians are examined closely by opponents, journalists and voters. The party’s ability to maintain discipline while expanding rapidly could therefore become an important factor in determining its future development.
The relationship between Reform UK and Labour is especially significant because both parties have attempted to appeal to voters who feel economically or politically neglected. Their policy approaches are different, but they can compete for some of the same voters on issues such as living standards, immigration and trust in government.
Labour’s response is therefore likely to be closely watched. The party may seek to emphasise its record in government, investment in public services and economic policies while attempting to address concerns that have pushed some voters towards Reform. How Labour responds could influence whether Reform’s current gains remain temporary or become part of a longer-term change in Britain’s political competition.
The Conservatives also face pressure from Reform UK. If Reform continues attracting former Conservative voters, the right-of-centre vote could remain divided. That division could have significant consequences under Britain’s electoral system, particularly in closely contested constituencies.
The next phase of British politics may consequently involve more than a traditional Labour-versus-Conservative contest. Reform UK has introduced another major variable, while the Liberal Democrats, Greens and regional parties continue to compete for voters in different parts of the country.
For voters, the changing landscape means that political choices may increasingly depend on individual issues rather than long-standing party identity. Younger voters, working-class voters and politically disengaged voters may be particularly important in determining how these shifts develop.
Whether the reported movement from Labour to Reform becomes a lasting realignment remains uncertain. Electoral trends can change quickly, especially when governments face economic difficulties or when new political issues dominate public debate. Strong results in one period can create momentum, but maintaining that momentum requires organisation, credible policies and continued voter support.
Nevertheless, Reform UK’s recent performance has demonstrated that the party cannot easily be dismissed as a marginal force. Its growing presence has altered the strategic calculations of the established parties and intensified debate about the future direction of British politics.
The significance of the “meteoric” results therefore lies not only in the number of seats or councils won, but also in what they reveal about voter behaviour. If some Labour supporters are genuinely moving towards Reform UK, it could indicate dissatisfaction with the government’s performance or a broader change in political priorities. If the movement is temporary, Reform may still have demonstrated its ability to disrupt established electoral patterns.
Either way, Nigel Farage’s party has become an important part of Britain’s political conversation. Its rise has forced Labour and the Conservatives to pay closer attention to voters who feel ignored by the traditional political establishment.
The coming electoral contests will provide further evidence about whether Reform UK can transform recent gains into a durable political presence. For now, the party is presenting its results as proof that British politics is undergoing a significant transformation, while its opponents and political observers will be watching closely to determine how deep and lasting that transformation really is.